IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] MELGs - Q&A

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Mon, 25 March 2013 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A73221F8E7F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKpHImalsik5 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384E821F8E51 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id APT33918; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:29:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:29:06 +0000
Received: from SZXEML418-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.157) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:29:18 +0000
Received: from SZXEML552-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.42]) by szxeml418-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:29:14 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] MELGs - Q&A
Thread-Index: AQHOIGPek8R0zdnmbUizkEjN3z7415ivh4owgAA2TQCAATLDIIAAeV3g///IfQCABM8nkA==
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:29:14 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8431571FF@SZXEML552-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvskemP5yyUHXWr8iHWB0V_jh8Q_hAudxNQnCA0++0Xiw@mail.gmail.com> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8358877E9@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CDAC6F6F5401B245A2C68D0CF8AFDF0A191B0ED0@atl-srv-mail10.atl.advaoptical.com> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF835887B75@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF835887C70@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <CA+YzgTvbQDzh9yVJmO1HuNyQOFDXsccrTbO5Fz7jE28wv4U3dA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvbQDzh9yVJmO1HuNyQOFDXsccrTbO5Fz7jE28wv4U3dA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF8431571FFSZXEML552MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] MELGs - Q&A
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 06:29:25 -0000

Hi Pavan,

I am not sure how much VL (Virtual Link) will be used in the practical deployment and how often concurrent path computation will be used.

Do you think if it makes sense to add a flag (in routing advertisement) to indicate a link is a VL or not?



Best Regards

Fatai

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 8:57 PM
To: Fatai Zhang
Cc: Igor Bryskin; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] MELGs - Q&A

Fatai, Hi!

Good to see that you understand the construct now.

This is not a corner case. The utility of the construct becomes quite significant if you have an application that does concurrent path computations on an abstract topology.

Regards,
-Pavan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email