Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Really good catch, Tom.

What Lou suggests looks the best way to handle it.

A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 23 August 2013 14:38
> To: t.petch; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
> 
> Tom,
> 	See below.
> 
> ...
> 
> >> On 8/21/2013 6:55 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> ...
> 
> >>>
> >>> Please add a note to the IANA considerations section to request an
> >>> update to
> >>>
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib/ianagmplstc-mib.xhtml
> >>>
> >>> Possibly you should refer to it as IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB rather than
> > through
> >>> the URL.
> >> The proposed text to be added to the end of the section is:
> >>
> >>    A parallel change to IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB is also required. In
> >>    particular, under IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC a reference to this
> >>    document should be added as item 3. Also the following changes
> > should
> >>    be made to the related values:
> >>
> >>           deprecated(2),      -- Deprecated
> >>           deprecated(3),      -- Deprecated
> >>           deprecated(4),      -- Deprecated
> >
> > Mmmmm RFC4181 says
> >
> > "Therefore, labels of named numbers and named
> >   bits MUST NOT be changed when revising IETF MIB modules (except to
> >   correct typographical errors), and they SHOULD NOT be changed when
> >   revising enterprise MIB modules.
> > "
> >
> > so I do not think that you can do that.  Change of STATUS (which applies
> > to the whole TC) yes, label no. (Don't you love SNMP?)
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> 
> Looks like you're right.
> 
> Perhaps the following is the "right" middle ground:
> Existing:
>                   psc2(2),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 2
>                   psc3(3),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 3
>                   psc4(4),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 4
> Revised:
>                   psc2(2),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
>                   psc3(3),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
>                   psc4(4),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
> 
> Adrian,
> 
> Do you agree with the above?  This is a bit different than your request.
> 
> Much thanks,
> Lou