Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4A31A019C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:50:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deXnJPvVWSvT for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:50:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C1D1A017E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:50:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10186; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1394113839; x=1395323439; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xCBc6SaxgHDcGvT3kKV+ZgrvowypocmYX+OPQDgo16U=; b=euAm/z05jZ9SwqfWseoUG8EMYYUEg77CCCjf+dRLGr4bFrJZb6uWY+LG w7ifz1sHqrf7FAB58rgaBG/fX+aUp/VqzOJMLIhdaBUYVeFMORUHhxU6Q Z8J1zimVU0oYFA4dXD41Vx/S8YPHRECMUfpXa253o8tSe3qoFmY8MyV6p Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFANl8GFOtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABagkJEO1fBH4EVFnSCJQEBAQQtTBACAQgRBAEBCx0HMhQJCAEBBAENBQiHcc8pF44qMQYBgySBFASqaYMtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,600,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="25398868"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2014 13:50:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s26DoTjs002605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:50:29 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.7.141]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:50:28 -0600
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on LSP diversity
Thread-Index: Ac85Lkta5sA01iJZS9C+dtT+EJyPhAAFJE4w
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:50:28 +0000
Message-ID: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC108523FD@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD42B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD42B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.244.207]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC108523FDxmbrcdx03ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/h0VNWry8701r895jL4qmmi6MPjs
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:50:45 -0000

Daniele,

ISTR Gert asked about this on Tuesday, and the reply was that this is outside the scope of CCAMP and therefore of the work being proposed here.

I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong about that :)

Cheers

Matt

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 6:36 AM
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity

Hi,

bringing this to the list due to time constraints.

We said we have 4 use cases for LSP diversity:

-        1. Single homing

-        2. Dual homing

-        3. LSPs with different edge and core nodes

-        4. Multi domain

In cases 3 and 4 there is the need for "coordination" between edge nodes. Is such coordination in CCAMP scope or we assume that "somehow" the two edge nodes exchange such piece of info (e.g. NMS, the triangle with the eye, or whatever)?

BR
Daniele