Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity
Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942491A036D for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:43:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZ1KX4_FqySS for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E991A02F7 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:42:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d8e000002a7b-03-5318896cad33
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EA.99.10875.C6988135; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:42:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.65]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:42:52 +0100
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on LSP diversity
Thread-Index: Ac85Lkta5sA01iJZS9C+dtT+EJyPhAAFJE4wAAGp/AA=
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:42:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD570@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
References: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD42B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC108523FD@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC108523FD@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD570ESESSMB301erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW5Op0SwQfsrfYsnc26wWMx5yezA 5DHl90ZWjyVLfjIFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZdzdtpGx4GhKxen5FxgbGP9FdDFyckgImEj8 aNvFCGGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0jgEKNE+8uzzBDOIkaJ7cf3snYxcnCwCVhJPDnkA2KKCMRL3Hnl D2IKC6hJ3NxRDzJGREBdYtXTpawQtpVEy593zCA2i4CKxI1fT5hAbF4BX4nfh06wgdhCAhMY Jd69BYtzAsUPrl0Ddg6jgKzEhN2LwGxmAXGJW0/mM0GcKSCxZM95ZghbVOLl43+sELaSxIrt lxhBzmEWyJfYsdAcYpWgxMmZT1gmMIrMQjJpFkLVLCRVECV6EjemTmGDsLUlli18zQxh60rM +HeIBVl8ASP7Kkb23MTMnPRyw02MwIg5uOW37g7GU+dEDjFKc7AoifN+eOscJCSQnliSmp2a WpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoGxwqX1xWW9tsWi/NMXbpj3Q0zS8Wun44TM9dmtZ/pKTv2t/a/J u0MhIfVX+f/Ev7ZXPAIzTs0x8zjrlMK244by5dKvuh4LVypPLP75PmlFbfl09cTt7FtXf1bU c5K84+PlPXnb9B1qa/g8wlQKmLS3vZyXUXB4z/X3Enrx7ryfZghKeRzxF1igxFKckWioxVxU nAgA4fmwSGYCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wrmNitfJO880o1h-MYyTKzTg0i0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:43:00 -0000
Hi Matt, I don't recall such decision, but I trust you if you say that it was made. In that case I have to support Gert then :) Cheers Danieele From: Matt Hartley (mhartley) [mailto:mhartley@cisco.com] Sent: giovedì 6 marzo 2014 13:50 To: Daniele Ceccarelli; CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org) Cc: Matt Hartley (mhartley) Subject: RE: Question on LSP diversity Daniele, ISTR Gert asked about this on Tuesday, and the reply was that this is outside the scope of CCAMP and therefore of the work being proposed here. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong about that :) Cheers Matt From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 6:36 AM To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>) Subject: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Hi, bringing this to the list due to time constraints. We said we have 4 use cases for LSP diversity: - 1. Single homing - 2. Dual homing - 3. LSPs with different edge and core nodes - 4. Multi domain In cases 3 and 4 there is the need for "coordination" between edge nodes. Is such coordination in CCAMP scope or we assume that "somehow" the two edge nodes exchange such piece of info (e.g. NMS, the triangle with the eye, or whatever)? BR Daniele
- [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Gabriele Maria Galimberti (ggalimbe)
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Adrian Farrel
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Gert Grammel
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity Gert Grammel