IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 11:36 UTC

Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7081A0272 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 03:36:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FiCRwZme4bzR for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 03:36:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9081A026A for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 03:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f038e000005d01-7d-53185d9ca683
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 83.87.23809.C9D58135; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:35:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB301.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.65]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 12:35:56 +0100
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Question on LSP diversity
Thread-Index: Ac85Lkta5sA01iJZS9C+dtT+EJyPhA==
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:35:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD42B@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126AD42BESESSMB301erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6cWIlgg861OhZP5txgcWD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxvzza1kKbplVNH9tZ29gbDPoYuTkkBAwkTjXOpMVwhaTuHBv PRuILSRwiFHi/l/LLkYuIHsRkL1mBVCCg4NNwEriySEfkBoRAV2JvRuvM4PYwgJKEqd3djFB xNUlVj1dygph60k8v/iJBcRmEVCRuP/1KBPIGF4BX4mD321AwowCshITdi9iBLGZBcQlbj2Z zwRxjoDEkj3nmSFsUYmXj/9Bnakksej2ZyaI+nyJv713wHp5BQQlTs58wjKBUWgWklGzkJTN QlIGEdeRWLD7ExuErS2xbOFrZhj7zIHHTMjiCxjZVzGy5yZm5qSXG21iBIb8wS2/VXcw3jkn cohRmoNFSZz3w1vnICGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2MjYccGkp3OjxXXXi34O2P NSzRhg82if5yEDvGV9nWmRLLLVFm71qcodV39ugBT9/Lc82Krsiz3/2iJVqtM/VY3d7XltEf /8VdrS+0fs9VO+F+pcCrxdwWX2fskpry+3mTp33DhzPdHxhjedfeWfGsojRrM0/mHPW9BaqZ fts+2p34uoRLNKVWiaU4I9FQi7moOBEASCaMVEcCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/db39zP1CwkbVGMSxY_12V7OlLpY
Subject: [CCAMP] Question on LSP diversity
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:36:03 -0000

Hi,

bringing this to the list due to time constraints.

We said we have 4 use cases for LSP diversity:

-          1. Single homing

-          2. Dual homing

-          3. LSPs with different edge and core nodes

-          4. Multi domain

In cases 3 and 4 there is the need for "coordination" between edge nodes. Is such coordination in CCAMP scope or we assume that "somehow" the two edge nodes exchange such piece of info (e.g. NMS, the triangle with the eye, or whatever)?

BR
Daniele

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email