Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document
Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com> Fri, 15 April 2011 02:08 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB38E0677; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9XLWQNWRa1m; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6181E065C; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LJO00LR68KHCX@szxga05-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:07:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml204-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LJO00KOO8KE98@szxga05-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:07:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.35) by szxeml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:07:10 +0800
Received: from SZXEML508-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.154]) by szxeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([169.254.173.75]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:07:26 +0800
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:07:25 +0000
From: Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <OFCF718764.E2B808A5-ON48257872.004B380C-48257872.004E5FC3@zte.com.cn>
X-Originating-IP: [10.110.98.34]
To: "zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn" <zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn>
Message-id: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927AFAA19@szxeml508-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Cu3JaQ2BZDbgaT0qnkHUKg)"
Content-language: zh-CN
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document
Thread-index: AQHL+q7eE1sS729V5EKMlYqM/+KKRZReKzYg
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927AFA5F4@szxeml508-mbs.china.huawei.com> <OFCF718764.E2B808A5-ON48257872.004B380C-48257872.004E5FC3@zte.com.cn>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "ccamp-bounces@ietf.org" <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 02:08:51 -0000
Hi Fei, Thanks for your prompt reply. Although the suggested statement could solve the problem of confliction, it still looks a little strange that the IDs in the extended ASSOCIATION object may have nothing to do with the two associated LSPs. Regards, Jie From: zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn [mailto:zhang.fei3@zte.com.cn] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 10:16 PM To: Jie Dong Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; ccamp-bounces@ietf.org; Lou Berger Subject: Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document Hi Jie Thank you for the comments. :) According to the description in section 4 "The Association ID MUST be set to its own signaled LSP ID (default); if known, it MAY be set to the LSP ID of the associated reverse LSP." "The first 16-bits MUST be set to its own tunnel ID (default); if known, it May be set to the tunnel ID of the associated reverse tunnel." What about the revision like this: "if known, it MAY be set to the LSP ID of the associated reverse LSP or inherited from the corresponding recovery LSP." I will address all the comments in the next version. Best regards Fei :) Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com> 发件人: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org 2011-04-14 20:22 收件人 Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org> 抄送 主题 Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document Hi authors, One quick comment here. In section 3.3 recovery considerations, it says " LSP3... can share the same TE tunnel with LSP1 or not. ... This can be done by inserting the Extended ASSOCIATION object in LSP3's Path message with the same value as in LSP1's Path message." This means LSP3 may use LSP1's IDs in the Extended ASSOCIATION object in its Path message, which may contain Tunnel_Num and LSP_ID different from its own and LSP2's. However, in section 4, the specification of Association ID and Extended Association ID field says: o Association ID: The Association ID MUST be set to its own signaled LSP ID (default); if known, it MAY be set to the LSP ID of the associated reverse LSP. o Extended Association ID: ... the first 16-bits MUST be set to its own tunnel ID (default); if known, it May be set to the tunnel ID of the associated reverse tunnel. Hence the two specifications conflict with each other. Regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Lou Berger > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 5:24 PM > To: ccamp@ietf.org > Subject: [CCAMP] poll on making > draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document > > All, > > This is to start a two week poll on making > draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a ccamp working > group document. Please send mail to the list indicating "yes/support" > or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your technical > reservations with the document. > > The poll ends Friday April 15. > > Much thanks, > Lou (and Deborah) > > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list > CCAMP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp _______________________________________________ CCAMP mailing list CCAMP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
- [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Dieter Beller
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Dieter Beller
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… fu.xihua
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… venkatesan mahalingam
- [CCAMP] 答复: poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… wang.xuerong
- [CCAMP] 答复: poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… wang.qilei
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Mukund Mani
- [CCAMP] 答复: poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Bao.Yuanlin
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… he.wenjuan1
- Re: [CCAMP] poll onmaking draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… xuyunbin
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Daniel King
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… dai.xuehui
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Attila Takacs
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… Fatai Zhang
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Jing Ruiquan
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Giovanni Martinelli
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Isacco Fontana
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Ramon Casellas
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Jie Dong
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Attila Takacs
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Jie Dong
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Jie Dong
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… zhang.fei3
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Lou Berger
- [CCAMP] Requirement for singled ended provisionin… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on makingdraft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsv… So, Ning
- Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rs… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] Requirement for singled ended provisi… Attila Takacs
- Re: [CCAMP] Requirement for singled ended provisi… zhang.fei3