Re: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document

Hi authors,

You talk about two provisioning models: "single" and "double" sided modes. 

Double sided is clear, it uses independent signaling for the two LSPs. 

Single sided, if I understood correctly, somehow binds the two LSP signaling phases together. I have some doubts that this model is needed. It seems to complicate operation and it also begs the question why not use bidirectional LSPs instead. 

I think two independently signaled LSPs with the addition of the proposed Association object would do the job addressing the associated bidirectional LSP requirements, so that transit nodes are also aware of the binding.

Best regards,
Attila 

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:24 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] poll on making draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a WG document

All,

This is to start a two week poll on making
draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-04 a ccamp working group document. Please send mail to the list indicating "yes/support"
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document.

The poll ends Friday April 15.

Much thanks,
Lou (and Deborah)

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp