IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 09 October 2017 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C69134E10; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l23XvWX7bqOT; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4692713307D; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=933; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507541530; x=1508751130; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f3yQp2jhdOEC4svJDC8UqXWEBSx+rV1MM9O1ZfkLUfQ=; b=G/cn92131OcBJSAzSYUcvLCnu1O7xPiGKYcLTRK+M0H8y5jIXAeQOSYM jKseL5OxmMak7cwnD5/Yf+Zjk9ddGC7rFUhP/Quv4VWtGWuBIn9hPrPWC Hy3OAm5jAwaEepUL+8wIOMtLxjnZ8qFIylqvzkuiiF9TEF6D394qIrHWd g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCAQABQdtZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBhEFuhCGLE5BCCZZfggQKJ4UKCgKEbxUBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZBiMVQRALDgwCJgICVwYBDAgBAYosEKcbgieLLAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYEOgh+DU4IVC4JzgzKBGgUBEgGDMoJhAQShNYdejQmLXYcujX2HXYE5NSKBAwsyIQgdFYVjHIFpPjuHMYI0AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,500,1500940800"; d="scan'208";a="697907214"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2017 09:32:08 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v999W8h0026984; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 09:32:08 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, ccamp@ietf.org
Cc: draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module@ietf.org, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <20171009.111354.2211060789355821652.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <75ba97f8-541c-9021-48a7-9eb28701c32e@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 11:32:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171009.111354.2211060789355821652.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/iGb7O0_0SN1iuuo5rWlwENITA7s>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:32:13 -0000

Dear all,

I'm also interested to see if CCAMP people are really interested to 
provide feedback...

Regards, Benoit
> Hi,
>
> We have received quite a lot of emails indicating support for the
> draft "draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module".  People are asking why
> nothing happens with this draft.
>
> It was decided that CCAMP might be the best place for this draft, but
> since then people have expressed that they rather want NETMOD to work
> on it.
>
> I sent this email to CCAMP but never got any feedback:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/f4qUNkpsT5dVF_1l9Ibd3hH1YA4/?qid=2187bb6a3443f12d15a29a03486f0754
>
> It would be much appreciated if anyone in CCAMP that are also working
> on the generic alarm functionality in ITU could send feedback on this
> document.
>
> The document can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module
>
>
> /martin
> .
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email