IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CCAMP] 答复: draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Mon, 09 October 2017 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCDB134E59; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Q-4is3h65ih; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE032134E57; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 02:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DXE43005; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:28:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:28:58 +0100
Received: from DGGEML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.64]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:28:56 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
CC: "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module@ietf.org" <draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again
Thread-Index: AQHTQN8wsFE+zxe68kGNgJtvxZL0G6LbPcOg
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:28:54 +0000
Message-ID: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43A2C83DA@DGGEML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <20171009.111354.2211060789355821652.mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20171009.111354.2211060789355821652.mbj@tail-f.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.57.78.212]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.59DB415C.001A, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.9.64, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 16d00e9ac6d119284c982c8172332149
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/sP7Q2ojn-BrlMXUQBPXPNtb06kc>
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 09:29:04 -0000

Hello Martin, 

Great to see this work brought back, actually we are interested and looking forward to see this work progress in IETF 99 but there was no presentation and we failed to find any of the co-authors of this draft. 

We had similar idea about the alarm work and there was one draft published as https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sharma-netmod-fault-model-01 . we have reviewed both this draft and draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module, and would like to drive on merging into one. It was observed that draft-vallin is more complete than draft-sharma, but the only problem is that the reference to ITU-T work is too old. We are also seeking for some support from ITU side, so that we can update the draft after there were agreement. 

Please feel free to comment if you have other ideas, thank you. 

Best wishes,
Haomian

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Martin Bjorklund
发送时间: 2017年10月9日 17:14
收件人: ccamp@ietf.org
抄送: bclaise@cisco.com; draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module@ietf.org
主题: [CCAMP] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module again

Hi,

We have received quite a lot of emails indicating support for the draft "draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module".  People are asking why nothing happens with this draft.

It was decided that CCAMP might be the best place for this draft, but since then people have expressed that they rather want NETMOD to work on it.

I sent this email to CCAMP but never got any feedback:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/f4qUNkpsT5dVF_1l9Ibd3hH1YA4/?qid=2187bb6a3443f12d15a29a03486f0754

It would be much appreciated if anyone in CCAMP that are also working on the generic alarm functionality in ITU could send feedback on this document.

The document can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module


/martin

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email