Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific curve around 256bit work factor (ends on February 23rd)

Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Sun, 22 February 2015 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6861A1A37 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuqAT2CvrrqE for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93D4B1A0385 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pabkq14 with SMTP id kq14so20822872pab.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=7Bf/jqnCJSglR3TFqB/UyKWSBf+CCoTktiUmF7pBzhE=; b=jwmKdq4JQQMicsU4EXmphTXI453yvsEU4NGwi5R9Vt+iaMSn++rHEdSTZsNNaN91HE lTvXwfld1igzf9Uq+LPCMBptaOKqhImJE9o18B4j4dUOHyz/BGzS6IGPMr6bqFmCEZFT SbSNt/FSPFGeTP9lXJ0bfjOSKX4ZQ9gg5y7xS0T/Xxi7ezGqV5Hnr4T6GvINVvCGjPzu OVEBVgPAvUipU8JntDS85oAw0rIguM+SkAzhQ+lI3jWJjiHzBfGg8VqdxoIUk7K0jWV9 mmDm8Q00H0zCDXUAY7fnoBfzq9Ky/qWPBZ/AOJ4LpwDE5cjbRBdeB0mm3zjfs+EuuKAK kCEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnXfO3AGlsDfpr0AqTa31AAqK0MGCKWW8BU8A4+2RqiLYfX6Ar0MeXgbexlh2tEVHp2f74Z
X-Received: by 10.66.158.163 with SMTP id wv3mr11649698pab.53.1424614005091; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.157] ([175.157.77.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm16403878pdp.10.2015.02.22.06.06.41 for <cfrg@irtf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54E9E26B.6000103@azet.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 15:06:35 +0100
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <54E46EA4.9010002@isode.com> <CAHOTMVKCD+DK6QbSuy8R63FVnu_WBNmwMvByqicx=sK6_k63HQ@mail.gmail.com> <D10CAF3B.3F266%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <CAMm+Lwhj9H_NK22QbTB7=EFd7GBg0WprwRMN8RxH3+7r_buf7g@mail.gmail.com> <54E795DA.3080502@akr.io> <D10E3729.3F869%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk> <54E89E3D.3050309@akr.io>
In-Reply-To: <54E89E3D.3050309@akr.io>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7564FDAE8014182DB9E806F3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/30IkAKuGL0GLSXhG6ip_q0_kadY>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on specific curve around 256bit work factor (ends on February 23rd)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:06:47 -0000

Hi,

For the record:

255: Preferred.
414: Acceptable.
448: Preferred.
521: Acceptable.

Consider the remaining alternatives as a clear: No.


With regard to the short off-topic discussion on Moore's Law. Most
people seem to reference this paper but have never read it or long
forgotten what it states. Reduction in cost of production (thus consumer
products) is a big theme in the original work [0]; rarely mentioned when
this paper is referenced. In the HPC community there's been consensus
that "moore's law is coming to an end" for quite some time. The US DoE
has been working on an outline for "exascale computing" for quite some
time -- main concerns are actually green computing, IO bottlenecks,
alternative computing architectures (e.g. Harvard) and use of
specialized hardware over general purpose hardware. Might be interesting
to some [1] [2] [3].

Aaron

[0] http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~fussell/courses/cs352h/papers/moore.pdf
[1]
http://science.energy.gov/~/media/ascr/ascac/pdf/meetings/20140210/Top10reportFEB14.pdf
[2] http://science.energy.gov/ascr/news-and-resources/program-documents/
[3] http://exascale.org/