Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 06 October 2014 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37F11A0351 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWC7iFTk7lp5 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543D51A0353 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 08:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B878BE02; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:57:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4xPDv45n9P4; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:57:36 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [134.226.36.180] (stephen-think.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.180]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE964BDF9; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:57:36 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <5432BBF1.5060003@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:57:37 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
References: <CACsn0cnHDc6_jWf1mXc5kQgj5XEc6dBBZa7K8D2=4uLti5e3aA@mail.gmail.com> <3EE5AEA5-3ADE-4D67-AC51-478074349D1B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EE5AEA5-3ADE-4D67-AC51-478074349D1B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/PnfuI3hXJ6JkZ2_AnWy6OKD1Ymc
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:57:41 -0000

Hiya,

On 06/10/14 16:53, Yoav Nir wrote:
> They’re all good enough

Tend to agree. But CFRG, pretty-please don't pick them all!

If you do we'll just have to pick elsewhere (e.g. saag or
specific IETF wgs) with less clue immediately involved.

S.