Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A461AD1EE for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:38:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hd2cPqBxDh3P for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:38:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB68F1AD190 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:38:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1421951880; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=b+GQcjxFKLY5jPMFcIB5Clq/90hubrNyvoyOVsmWlqg=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=wWHm01DqkP7Xm/PY0FUxjxD1khK4bX6w0QgOhNiOED5Iv/RHlhSIYdEDHRapwgedcVhEvW ZwhlGX59zE6dClL+8538dRmn5sRQryERA8noVRFbR8+9hRyUEdG4rtCCU2sITMOyoNk+Rg wTS0a/npiSt9cwuR+bDAkdYyKkvrimY=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VMFDhwAKaFZ=@waldorf.isode.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:37:59 +0000
Message-ID: <54C142C3.6030807@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:34:43 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <BF9DADF6-003F-454D-8E96-4A28A060CA72@isode.com> <54AAEC3F.1090308@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <54AAEC3F.1090308@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060002070300060400040905"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/xrhwZd3qoIZESw-9wRw3_tENTbg>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Adoption of draft-ladd-spake2 as a RG document
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:38:03 -0000

On 05/01/2015 19:55, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> On 14/12/2014 16:41, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This message starts 3 weeks adoption call for draft-ladd-spake2. 
>> Please reply to this message or directly to CFRG chairs, stating one 
>> of the following
>>
>> 1) that you are happy to adopt the draft as a starting point
>> 2) that you are not happy to adopt this draft
>> or
>> 3) that you think the document needs more work before the RG should 
>> consider adopting it
>>
>> While detailed document reviews are generally welcome, this not a 
>> call to provide detailed comments on the document.
> So far I have 4 people in favour of working on this and 3 against 
> (some of these replied privately). I have emailed a few more, but I 
> would like more feedback.
There a few more responses in favour of working on this item, so there 
is now a critical mass to take on this work.

Watson, can you please post the latest version you have as 
draft-irtf-spake2-00.txt.

Thank you,
Alexey

P.S. I got a private message that the PAKE requirement draft is being 
worked on. I don't know when this will appear, but there is some work 
being done.

P.P.S. CFRG chairs will shortly review and post results of the CFRG call 
about draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00. Stay tuned.