IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC

"Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com> Wed, 06 April 1994 21:00 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11745; 6 Apr 94 17:00 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11740; 6 Apr 94 17:00 EDT
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26342; 6 Apr 94 17:00 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3851; Wed, 06 Apr 94 16:58:51 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 3850; Wed, 06 Apr 94 16:35:44 EDT
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 1994 15:29:00 -0500
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Comments: <Parser> W: TO field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com>
Subject: Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC
X-To: John C Klensin <KLENSIN@infoods.unu.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9404061700.aa26342@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Gentlemen,

Can we wrap this up already?

John was willing to issue a last call after IETF in Seattle.  That has now.
If we need another set of changes and a new ID, let's do it within a week.

OK?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email