Re: [codec] possible issues to track

The comment was from me, and it was addressed towards the sensitivities of
cross-SDO relationships.  It is one thing if the ITU states that something
is better than ITU-Rec xxx, but it is another thing if another body states
this.  Certainly without having received appropriate input from the ITU
after requesting it through a liaison.
Stephan

On 3.25.2010 14:32 , "Jean-Marc Valin" <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> wrote:

> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> - avoid phrasing subjective comparision in relation to ITU codecs
> 
> I was actually surprised to see that one come up. As far as I know, most
> ITU terms of reference include comparisons like "better than G.722 at rate
> X". Does the ITU phrase this differently then we did?
> 
> As for the way of discussing the issues, it seems to me like the mailing
> list is just simpler. Most people so far have commented on the list anyway.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jean-Marc
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec