Re: [codec] possible issues to track

Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com> Thu, 25 March 2010 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3A43A6CD9 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSubZEoPCfhb for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAILEXCH.octasic.com (mail.octasic.com [70.54.254.106]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63EC3A6CB8 for <codec@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [142.138.24.13] ([142.138.24.13]) by MAILEXCH.octasic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:29:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4BABD67A.3040902@octasic.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:32:42 -0400
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@octasic.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4BABD1D5.80102@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4BABD1D5.80102@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2010 21:29:43.0628 (UTC) FILETIME=[48F3D0C0:01CACC62]
Cc: Codec WG <codec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [codec] possible issues to track
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:29:22 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> - avoid phrasing subjective comparision in relation to ITU codecs

I was actually surprised to see that one come up. As far as I know, most
ITU terms of reference include comparisons like "better than G.722 at rate
X". Does the ITU phrase this differently then we did?

As for the way of discussing the issues, it seems to me like the mailing
list is just simpler. Most people so far have commented on the list anyway.

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc