Re: [codec] Royalty Free codec standards -- don't settle for less

Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net> Wed, 11 November 2009 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <koen.vos@skype.net>
X-Original-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5362C28C266 for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RVnLjvfBA-NP for <codec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (mail.skype.net [212.187.172.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9AE3A6878 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DEA60647AA1; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=Qc8FqJmZOMia Z4zHpctCIa+9yXQ=; b=OOj7DOJXzn1rMCMMd9sLP0a9zyEq/xEJU9miZARSw3rI 8wRTbhn77TxLICfH+c2od0TgKVXVCBflWprO03Ts1Kbd9K8gtfWfeZEl3q/YAaeq +9LGaRWOhCVaykseLPqbYsJq+tNrRPTkcfU87zBSwz35srss7xrDw0Ds2eVQTx0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=a1x1A9/9Y5f4Z3paZ2FE Rr28Xd7jkowa780MnvOXoAwzl4q1bwDHMVsRBwICq9csSZh664l2/bkb1D8BRj2w ObrIh9odolK3xmxgD2uTK4OBDic5Ag6hIBgXh+g32CbPwilmp4Ej5wLbX7lnAb5L KdmmT2h+soOZwbLhke6fBWs=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803C760647A95; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:59 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dub-mail.skype.net
Received: from mail.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dub-mail.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xlkzdSkN1Cid; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by mail.skype.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 1641A60647A50; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from softbank218116249033.bbtec.net (softbank218116249033.bbtec.net [218.116.249.33]) by mail.skype.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:50 -0800
Message-ID: <20091110192650.14630hs8dj0amxve@mail.skype.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:50 -0800
From: Koen Vos <koen.vos@skype.net>
To: Rob Glidden <rob.glidden@sbcglobal.net>
References: <4AFA11CC.5000908@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <4AFA11CC.5000908@sbcglobal.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.4)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] Royalty Free codec standards -- don't settle for less
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Should the IETF standardize wideband Internet codec\(s\)? " <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:26:33 -0000

1. Technological progress saturates.
2. Patents expire.
Therefore, the performance advantage of royalty-bearing standards  
diminishes with time, and high-quality, royalty-free standards are  
unavoidable. I'm convinced that today we have reached this point of  
commoditization for audio and speech coding technology.

koen.


Quoting Rob Glidden:
> Here is my view, perhaps you share it, perhaps you don't.
>
> What the world needs now is royalty-free, standardized codecs.  This  
> is critical to the future of the Web, and the progress the Internet  
> has brought to the world, and will bring to the world.
>
> Video, audio, transport, the whole thing.  Evaluated, vetted for  
> patents. Under an appropriate, responsible and complete royalty free  
> process.  No less.
>
> IETF, ITU, and ISO/MPEG should all get going on this important  
> activity -- after all why shouldn't all of these organizations  
> include this as core to their mission.
>
> I have, and no doubt you have too, seen countless explanations why  
> this should not, could not, will not, rather not, might not, or can  
> not happen.  Some well meaning and sincere, some from vested  
> interests.  There are too many "powerful" interests against it.   
> "Important" commercial interests are ambivalent.  It is too hard  
> "legally" or "politically" or "technically".  It is just too  
> confusing to think through.  There is no longer a critical mass that  
> cares enough about keeping the future of the Open Internet open and  
> royalty free.  The well meaning are ignorant, or naive.  Etc.
>
> Don't settle.  Take the issue of royalty free, standardized codecs  
> all the way to the top of these organizations. Do what it takes.  If  
> it requires new organizations, start them. It it requires revised  
> processes, revise them. This is the spirit that built the Web and  
> the Internet, this is the spirit that is its lifeblood, and this is  
> the spirit that needs to be at the heart of its future.
>
> Don't settle.  Don't let those who have tried hard already, or have  
> only half-heartedly tried, justify the status quo or their  
> half-heartedness.  Encourage them to focus on how to take the next  
> steps.  Don't let convenient "interpretations" of standards  
> processes be an excuse for never starting, never finishing, or never  
> setting up processes that will work.  Need more legal background?   
> Find it. More technical information? Get it.
>
> Don't settle.  The world has plenty of patent-encumbered media  
> standards, plenty of proprietary solutions, and plenty of standards  
> in other domains that have figured out how to deliver royalty free.   
> But the world does not have enough royalty-free codec standards, so  
> this is the task that needs to be addressed.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> codec mailing list
> codec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
>