Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds
"Angelo P. Castellani" <angelo@castellani.net> Mon, 05 March 2012 08:10 UTC
Return-Path: <angelo.castellani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A83621F8505 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:10:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MiC2TVaBpii for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:10:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEEC21F8503 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:10:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so1519641wic.31 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:10:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of angelo.castellani@gmail.com designates 10.180.79.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.79.231;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of angelo.castellani@gmail.com designates 10.180.79.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=angelo.castellani@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=angelo.castellani@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.79.231]) by 10.180.79.231 with SMTP id m7mr72312wix.11.1330935013967 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:10:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=udPKY5ZjwcdsraHblMf6uTJc66F0w437ZWy0pBfavDA=; b=CdHVoXJxodxH64VTrHL7MP3sC5koflaM1sTBog7Se8nWgX216WZc/SkmMpbkb7eIDv Ww8MwrrMi0u5n2RvzKHKAHJQjPyZv5LOVqC9Xynoy/bMzyDVq7xnGjNNxnDGaE3/GgUv QEeQR0tglphHt7CwpkrAgb2cCt/uAIYoCeRo7A2vrMa8rY4+jhV72b76ZAG5A16g0xzZ sZjOrC7jPPwfg0f+ojFveXJvfK2mruaSCW01O4xrFTD2LLoWBJ5VAeTb+TNDuy3gpPKk p7MhJ9XYF7LJpSYzmEAhZFF1u197pY85rKp+KPLCudOuuULkgdvUFYZAx2ait/Gv4eoj miVg==
Received: by 10.180.79.231 with SMTP id m7mr52095wix.11.1330935013882; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:10:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: angelo.castellani@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.210.12 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:09:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9B51E46C-D03D-4911-8D00-65B56DE48F63@koanlogic.com>
References: <9032C193-A015-4F41-B441-4D1D47594FC9@koanlogic.com> <4F53E746.7050401@piuha.net> <9B51E46C-D03D-4911-8D00-65B56DE48F63@koanlogic.com>
From: "Angelo P. Castellani" <angelo@castellani.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:09:33 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: z2E_lhgXOsXJte1cm-8O5PpTrNw
Message-ID: <CAPxkH3jC3iznkVTRnYneVw2dny=HvS0gn3PaQ2KHJ-jmX55s0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: core WG <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:10:16 -0000
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 06:28, Thomas Fossati <tho@koanlogic.com> wrote: > PS: It may also turn out that REQ3 of draft-shelby-core-coap-req is not an application layer issue! ;-) Indeed sensor networks support sleeping using radio duty cycling at lower layers, this turns out in having the sleeping functionality without any loss of communication at the upper layers. Best, Angelo
- [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Thomas Fossati
- [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Bruce Nordman
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Bruce Nordman
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Jari Arkko
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Jari Arkko
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Thomas Fossati
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Angelo P. Castellani
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Jari Arkko
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Angelo P. Castellani
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Jari Arkko
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Zhen Cao
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Thomas Fossati
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Dijk, Esko
- Re: [core] sleepy to sleepy communication I-Ds Falendysz, Gene