IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 12 July 2016 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976E3127077 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQOZXGceIFo3 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C8A4127071 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 04:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6CAxrup006616; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:59:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from roku (ip-109-45-2-164.web.vodafone.de [109.45.2.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3rpf9v3bhqzDgwy; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:59:46 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:59:32 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>
Message-ID: <30945651-d704-4b8a-9c4f-6a56a23daefb@roku>
In-Reply-To: <BB0DCC21-3198-4BA2-81ED-5A73724E1367@ackl.io>
References: <1ed9a5d16aca7d13412259e94afc1aa2@xs4all.nl> <BLUPR06MB17639739570760661AEC32C3FE3C0@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <aba83b0a6b9794f74ddfcb9706eba6d1@xs4all.nl> <BB0DCC21-3198-4BA2-81ED-5A73724E1367@ackl.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5784cd94_327b23c6_4256"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/O1D2hLULjF8IgaRIRaCjx7QQifg>
Cc: Core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:00:02 -0000

Hi Alexander,

This is right. However, I thought that in the discussion of unions we had arrived at encoding decimals as CBOR decimal fraction tags. But maybe I'm misremembering.  

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email