Re: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

Hi Michel,

the proposal is to keep one larger JSON examples, accompanied by its 
CBOR conversion, and all other larger examples to the appendix.
The one liners are perfect as they are.
It is only a minor suggestion to improve the reading.

Peter

Michel Veillette schreef op 2016-07-12 18:07:
> Hi Peter
> 
> Are you proposing to move all examples in an appendix or just the 
> larger ones.
> Most examples are single liners.
> 
> Should I move only the following ones:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-02#section-4.2.1
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-02#section-4.2.2
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-02#section-4.4.1
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-02#section-4.4.2
> 
> Regards,
> Michel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter van der Stok [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 6:23 AM
> To: Michel Veillette <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; Core <[e-mail]>
> Subject: RE: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1
> 
> I forgot to add the following in an earlier e_mail, Bit stupid to
> annoy all wg members with this trivial remark
> 
>> 
>> I think that a large number of the CBOR encoding examples in section
>> 4.2 can be left out.
>> They can be generated any time by an interested implementer; and now
>> confuse the issues.
>> 
>> [MV] I received many questions about the final encoding and the number
>> of bytes required.
>> [MV] If I remove these examples, I'm concern that I will receive even
>> more of these questions.
>> [MV] I agree that these examples are useless for peoples with a good
>> knowledge of CBOR [MV] but seem very welcome from newcomers.
>> 
> 
> What about putting them in an appendix?
> 
> Peter