IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] YANG to CBOR , identification of objects

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 13 July 2016 06:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD3C12B031 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOtErOmKUNAH for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B6012B028 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.216]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id J6XW1t00L4fjQrE016XWGT; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:31:33 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:64eb:91b1:57ea:8151 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:31:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:31:30 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <57851437.2070405@tzi.org>
References: <1ed9a5d16aca7d13412259e94afc1aa2@xs4all.nl> <BLUPR06MB17639739570760661AEC32C3FE3C0@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <0ab68685ab75d14335cb130faa1f5722@xs4all.nl> <BLUPR06MB176358F95C56C70A91ECB672FE300@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <57851437.2070405@tzi.org>
Message-ID: <baa2f5e0a517822f7bce733b9a9a40a5@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (S7HLKXapYaweLYGemecCooQVZgxX+yGF)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/w9aZ_eFUogwvAqBkiVBSjhW0kP4>
Cc: Alexander Pelov <alexander.pelov@telecom-bretagne.eu>, Core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] YANG to CBOR , identification of objects
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:31:38 -0000

> Actually I'm intrigued as to what that approach will be; until we know
> that, I'd be a bit weary about moving things around.
> 
Thanks for your interest.
However, the success of my proposal should not be of influence on the 
use of delta notation.

For the moment every YANG integer identifier MUST be encoded with delta 
notation. That is too restrictive in my opinion.
Secondly, using the delta notation can be interesting outside the YANG 
context.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email