IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Tue, 12 July 2016 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798DB12D794 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWyEqCQV80oo for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7357912D0AA for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 03:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.200]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id HmPV1t0064K0fSy01mPV9r; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:23:29 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:dbf:8e04:7626:a035 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:23:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 12:23:29 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Michel Veillette <Michel.Veillette@trilliantinc.com>, draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor@ietf.org
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR06MB17639739570760661AEC32C3FE3C0@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1ed9a5d16aca7d13412259e94afc1aa2@xs4all.nl> <BLUPR06MB17639739570760661AEC32C3FE3C0@BLUPR06MB1763.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <6ce5c06ff1c64d834ce1ccdda7b61ea4@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (LTJhAaBunWJIyhOuwVpeiWH5y2aUMv8c)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wnJpE5KuvE_rQwvHQWJfHttiHsQ>
Cc: Core <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] YANG to CBOR mapping version 1
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:23:33 -0000

I forgot to add the following in an earlier e_mail,
Bit stupid to annoy all wg members with this trivial remark

> 
> I think that a large number of the CBOR encoding examples in section
> 4.2 can be left out.
> They can be generated any time by an interested implementer; and now
> confuse the issues.
> 
> [MV] I received many questions about the final encoding and the number
> of bytes required.
> [MV] If I remove these examples, I'm concern that I will receive even
> more of these questions.
> [MV] I agree that these examples are useless for peoples with a good
> knowledge of CBOR
> [MV] but seem very welcome from newcomers.
> 

What about putting them in an appendix?

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email