IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Extending TLSA RFC to operate with TLS's new raw public keys

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 30 May 2014 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7054F1A048E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4SCcTH1cF9h for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA761A043F for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C010800AD for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1401474513; bh=ar3BxCBA+u2xofHu2Zg80WpXfaOuTRpmmeQp9GOrw78=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=E7nOMIdGWdr2pqlc1qjGo//ULrWjwYbehVh+XlFNw9GIR74028Ts1a+AIs6zmwvsm +4V3rXqCdms7eILPDsWAn1oyiW6Ro4NBOIDyymbspuRd+eugd8NYVkWHSQ9/Wqcire ed/7YTJP8OTh6mmvCA2aX+bWpmnhVrHHOiNHx1lQ=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s4UISXRm024368 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:28:33 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:28:33 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dane@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20140530141516.GR27883@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1405301426520.21222@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <201405290805.s4T85HBT008757@new.toad.com> <76254E90-245A-4502-AFBE-74A3038BB08F@vpnc.org> <201405300616.s4U6GwBT015849@new.toad.com> <20140530141516.GR27883@mournblade.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/Xp6BjLD1i80QNoEkisqdMpqw5JA
Subject: Re: [dane] Extending TLSA RFC to operate with TLS's new raw public keys
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 18:28:39 -0000

On Fri, 30 May 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

> Would it be a problem if this got covered consistently in multiple
> documents?  From the perspective of an implementor it would be
> helpful to see this covered in which-ever document I happened to
> be reading when adding bare public key support.

The bare public key document could refer to an ERRATA for 6698 that
states an ASN.1 SPKI structure is to be considered a "PKIX certificate"
in the context of TLSA certificate usage selectors?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email