Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Thu, 08 January 2015 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22D71A1B1E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:26:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w45CbhJxHfXE for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529A41A1B21 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id z20so5205804igj.4 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:26:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vwnfsMjSX1CYx5t5lIaKxN4JKdmcQFIlewChLqTiUqA=; b=ZKhf3zkz+MOPR5mOI+YVO9C0oIO+SEmWGaIWEKYH5xRQzNuwxmTaxOZSvsNIjUyAHk saqwullxp6WdE4QpI03Rno7q2F5YZgPlfQTZcwfFCVlf5CDyxFsM3eU2tGCHRwQPG0Mb sC726+5/EaKtlPqo/sLsIzPTjTCwFrto0Cdb2+9FHrajJORvtW000C3NglXoNZr8NES5 eabwibRHG69BKWpzvSy+0PW6P8poxUrywYdqIxUbxNIXjTeuChzihZJGOR5l/AtC+MPY 9lB3RCzb+gxtEsN4+2rixTwV4LttswrcuG6CvvQwEosw1DNSkumpsTLsGRVOi8/vfofQ 5vYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhMH1sXN5/632XeUa9rRFe+iB6KpcmZVSq9p99qgq4KmZsCSDgeIoepi/3ogzcULl6AH+5
X-Received: by 10.107.170.98 with SMTP id t95mr11579869ioe.7.1420755967823; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:26:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p198sm2928809iop.36.2015.01.08.14.26.05 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54AF03FC.2020603@andyet.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 15:26:04 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, dane@ietf.org
References: <0DAFC2A8-A1E2-46F4-BA52-E8261CB09159@ogud.com> <113FC996-99E2-4203-BA55-AA901F9C0893@ieca.com> <20150108011529.GU7322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <E2C24E69-2B55-4B61-A961-9E8DF5EFA437@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <E2C24E69-2B55-4B61-A961-9E8DF5EFA437@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/jQ6OybPrmf1brEEmpJbxHaJy7TU>
Subject: Re: [dane] WGLC: DANE-SRV & DANE-SMTP
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 22:26:11 -0000

On 1/8/15 3:23 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> On Jan 07, 2015, at 20:15, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
>
>>> I read the DANE-SRV record, had some nits (Victor also caught
>>> 'em), and support progressing the draft.
>>
>> I think you're saying that the associated revisions can be made as
>> part of moving into IETF LC, and don't need further WG review? Is
>> that right?  But being new around here, I am not quite sure.
>
> Yes - let’s get this one out the door.

Truth be told I haven't had time to review Viktor's proposed edits yet 
and I thought he was going to be posting more feedback, but if he's done 
then the authors can have a chat about how to address his input.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/