IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dane] S/MIME draft

"Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7121A8035 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kotugUhvo-36 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og122.obsmtp.com (exprod6og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CF4C1A802B for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from osprey.verisign.com ([216.168.239.75]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob122.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKU/yeR7bNL/PPHe7UZvQM5bAXDtJ8C8p2@postini.com; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 07:48:40 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by osprey.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id s7QEmddl018816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:48:39 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:48:38 -0400
From: "Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: S/MIME draft
Thread-Index: AQHPwTzSp2zLy/0IwEiIGXszYmLFzg==
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:48:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CE2072BD-39C8-42FE-B08D-7930667D5DEC@verisign.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EF452441-40E1-481B-9605-84CFE45FA555"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/zuagQGhvTVVKS8RkeiMSQ8_fy1g
Subject: [dane] S/MIME draft
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:48:42 -0000

Hey all,

Some time ago we had some discussions about draft-ietf-dane-smime, which led to 
	https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg06338.html
A few of us felt that it might be productive to outline a set of requirements that we foresee DANE facing in enterprises environments (w.r.t. encrypted/signed email).  To that end, we put together the draft:
	``Enterprise Requirements for Secure Email Key Management''
	http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-osterweil-dane-ent-email-reqs-00

We certainly welcome discussion and feedback, and we're hoping that this work will help inform the and evolve draft-ietf-dane-smime.

Thanks!

Eric

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email