Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Privacy of lists

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 07 November 2010 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58483A68EC for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 02:35:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.14
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZouVaGhEjgz for <datatracker-rqmts@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 02:35:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA933A69D4 for <datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 02:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id oA7AZ0fq010434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Nov 2010 02:35:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1289126131; x=1289212531; bh=ITZEO6kdSS1evkaYD5QjLY2oYc4S4wQMhuAnd3bOKZA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=pGIPnHvsyNSDHAGzfvASYYlS1lT1dC1om3RFSaaChF3JQM+wzalQonYx8SSJDBc6w oyHyukjWZiugcVzDZ8xq02vb0qftbJF6kIv+BZr6+DGQVsK7EdZcq5n+OIpvDxJ6EG gKIhUD8xypHrGKwwXEDKZ9e8gt9ulRKPkPYu4lCI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1289126131; x=1289212531; bh=ITZEO6kdSS1evkaYD5QjLY2oYc4S4wQMhuAnd3bOKZA=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=jKwe1LjguXzb79GCJV49qzg9fB5QWxqqa5lFBqV0JH2dXdT7yxk52bSTdBITopBiH UjKyb5IY4K8DqQtkZ3Ye9O8esvfx7r4O36slwb9V8J2MNP5FS76h9KW7GB8O/fIWwv UHxUUOfdDmzVx7RYr8xtZmECkWpywKykpivuhgNg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=y1EdJ+Gu79QHWtEWvkdLSh7gC8Gv26ahOKa3ijlJoVPEJq2loXzdj1SSqL0WHQvyu cx0HPLyk7atfaNMOYFUF9Elv0PQMybOpmLxFauDatp7GBWRJ4BQsG23h5OW5YIb1vVY BwksUqrkv5FYjptUAjFTzU3fRBo/DVZFc9fT9Us=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101107013057.0a87ad58@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 02:34:30 -0800
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <p06240829c8fb08d7af68@[10.20.30.150]>
References: <p06240800c8ecfbb84168@[10.20.30.249]> <p0624088ac8f4ef10b46d@[10.20.30.249]> <6.2.5.6.2.20101102074555.099f1830@resistor.net> <p06240894c8f5dde043db@[10.20.30.150]> <6.2.5.6.2.20101102110842.0a10f7c0@resistor.net> <p0624080ac8f7387faf99@[10.20.30.150]> <6.2.5.6.2.20101105005037.0a436570@resistor.net> <p06240829c8fb08d7af68@[10.20.30.150]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [datatracker-rqmts] Privacy of lists
X-BeenThere: datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <datatracker-rqmts.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts>
List-Post: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/datatracker-rqmts>, <mailto:datatracker-rqmts-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:35:24 -0000

Hi Paul,
At 06:31 06-11-10, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>OK, I'll remove this from the presentation then. If you can think of 
>words I can put in the draft to make it clear that these 
>lists-of-drafts are not discussion lists, I can do that.

As there is a BoF for the project, I suggest letting people flush 
this out as the argument may still be brought forward even with a rewording.

>Of course, if Yaron's preferences are adopted, this will be a non-issue.

The problem with building such tools is that there are always some 
feature that are good to have.  Yaron's preferences [1] side step the issues.

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/datatracker-rqmts/current/msg00020.html