Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 07 April 2015 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AC11B3636 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Z_zTmVS7brl for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF4E1B3665 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 07:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0311062A for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:47:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gn5OMQnPuaLT for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:47:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mobile-107-107-59-148.mycingular.net [107.107.59.148]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B923610602 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:47:30 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 10:47:27 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dbound@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150407144726.GB28661@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <55104501.3070906@KingsMountain.com> <CAEKtLiTXi387fEe_EffvTvTGR-xrMJxUMxf6fKWJxJn5ms97oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGrS0FKrPff19O_+iytu9GNw5avPWhdNw3-r-sad_ki1_NPwGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEKtLiQRu5RYOP3OdmoirPvbH0iQFsEwoKgM3mdmLJhmCiFcug@mail.gmail.com> <20150406220248.GR24862@mx2.yitter.info> <CAEKtLiSv9uKOQJ2Ke+8vnd+PUtVAaKGFc5AeSVaFroniGynbvA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiSv9uKOQJ2Ke+8vnd+PUtVAaKGFc5AeSVaFroniGynbvA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/6ZXMRFXw6g7uh5kAWIDCB78ReQg>
Subject: Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 14:47:35 -0000

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 06:28:20PM -0400, Casey Deccio wrote:
> Are you saying that there is no solution that can effectively use a
> public/private distinction of names to determine whether or not there is
> some sort of policy relationship between them?

I'm saying that the categories are either too generic not to need
subclassing (in which case they're inadequate to our needs) or else we
will solve the wrong problem (in which case, they're inadequate to our
needs).

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com