IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00

Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> Mon, 06 April 2015 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71751A909E for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M3l2dyjdX42w for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE4751A906F for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrs15 with SMTP id rs15so32635760ieb.3 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bmK9Y/VLK28W9jtdv64lfL2uOpy46j2lvUko9jXilUM=; b=II5sfpAOpoWvvNVI2QZPraPqgZwAIOfTLz5T0NdTf7MPyj1kmA9WcMiY1+XqqHkT+0 uWXEr2lkiCUL+vChYETmhXCHHVCVHrzLYa7SIV1evNiBDpZy3LwXAjfPMJ/OnL4ypSh6 XcJQUMyjKgCqBk3G5zV4z60CVFifUjP/bG/I4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bmK9Y/VLK28W9jtdv64lfL2uOpy46j2lvUko9jXilUM=; b=S08aZYyJfg+MKSdTsoDtvqnEYwdLhDUS576GXTzOTcymWuNrqOANhYnRHoaaeQP6ac 2vTaFBHVWc6GA57HNu4E+ZM78qQfpXfQf6Vu9YHuWU/lrQb+sCFjQ3pDbZB7MCFaytQj 2/XsRlQSaOnWotCw5IJSo0QzWhLmSstzCv4OOyeB5dDV1YRVdG1EjdRPefBdxL5enoUR eLILaZW5UGmNxX2+hfV61k+l77jZglQkU7oRzxB3ZUU8Rkzy8Xwgsu7YoFfhpSzcUxpZ 27Hz4m82t9g3QktrIWZsUmTNw8Z9akaC2wIf6ev5hcVRBdPiOn1ee0zZjeEuFC0AfCZS Ketg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqliZt0wXflf7rQ4wyv9COKpnamA4C3MOaxMsXDVVN3ae69CnKaYI9xSiWpVZqOo32aml1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.204.14 with SMTP id fk14mr22005309icb.96.1428359632218; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.196.5 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiSv9uKOQJ2Ke+8vnd+PUtVAaKGFc5AeSVaFroniGynbvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55104501.3070906@KingsMountain.com> <CAEKtLiTXi387fEe_EffvTvTGR-xrMJxUMxf6fKWJxJn5ms97oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGrS0FKrPff19O_+iytu9GNw5avPWhdNw3-r-sad_ki1_NPwGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEKtLiQRu5RYOP3OdmoirPvbH0iQFsEwoKgM3mdmLJhmCiFcug@mail.gmail.com> <20150406220248.GR24862@mx2.yitter.info> <CAEKtLiSv9uKOQJ2Ke+8vnd+PUtVAaKGFc5AeSVaFroniGynbvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:33:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1qrX=D8pxZSPkRbQ-iACTFk6N2gQrqFyhk0K__yqpFfXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
To: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30363b937d828b051315e462"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/MeeQ8RiPwx2NsBV8gXwwssi6G88>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:33:54 -0000

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am not even a little bit convinced that the distinction is part of
>> any solution.
>
>
> Are you saying that there is no solution that can effectively use a
> public/private distinction of names to determine whether or not there is
> some sort of policy relationship between them?
>

I think that Andrew is saying, and I agree, that the names "public" and
"private" are not useful any more in the dbound discussions. They are badly
overloaded and, at best, vaguely defined. We would be better served to
start referring to "foo" names and "bar" names. But I think that
categorization in general is still a misdirection to the task of
identifying names which share policy scopes.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email