IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> Mon, 06 April 2015 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <casey@deccio.net>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF1E1A870F for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPkLA8SA--GH for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95EA41A870E for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebrs15 with SMTP id rs15so32551873ieb.3 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=deccio.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6e9XzPhaZKTjQWATm+vh/t3As9Fu8jLXV5N3XGztbzg=; b=QBWu6t8ymdeaHhPu3ojTT9JKIPtpM81Un4CYf3MAjSnN7gYXxmviI7UTlGM5YXn06/ wmuqqiCsky/S/5+aBkW9b9rE0zFjmdCLzVg78Qf9teB7j7Qni/wTFCpdD81/KJUzsB+d wL2Hm3jfY9r+ySLMax0FAonnyUfkA6zxBTRhw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6e9XzPhaZKTjQWATm+vh/t3As9Fu8jLXV5N3XGztbzg=; b=S6dCtOzdFcXMgWZDf14vHDlXznUttgmFCxfvlEoQjdAAF/PK7qhbc2f5jiF0Q/H5Ey 3s3hR318s5kiU9eMc9Ofi4UycF/maXzvgTsew0WkMxQ2ZmEWySlFmWKd2DcEwepqajet 43WliKjqLUlfLeiIOLXV9i90u0uBRqo5bwBAmLqOlh+iOQY0OUfvi6LTCLJNvO22Faez pda46JwyhLyt9hRo+RwFbFU4hDnlR2Bnh1YefP/nF+ljYc0CNWRcx4NjJ17lGu1OsE7d mgAjLHhipbTPQ6IrNzRBAjPs+MFZIvH8quri/njbH7LpB8bT4oM+cr905XcF4irjspLc ANYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2Ikv6TF5B0nxh9oBOhhfa2QTztY+CnMrTiSzvq0o8cl0x5YJH/RH4vkDa/SoRQCIH/9TB
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.10.198 with SMTP id r6mr17072481icr.10.1428359301051; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.57.233 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150406220248.GR24862@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <55104501.3070906@KingsMountain.com> <CAEKtLiTXi387fEe_EffvTvTGR-xrMJxUMxf6fKWJxJn5ms97oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGrS0FKrPff19O_+iytu9GNw5avPWhdNw3-r-sad_ki1_NPwGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEKtLiQRu5RYOP3OdmoirPvbH0iQFsEwoKgM3mdmLJhmCiFcug@mail.gmail.com> <20150406220248.GR24862@mx2.yitter.info>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 18:28:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEKtLiSv9uKOQJ2Ke+8vnd+PUtVAaKGFc5AeSVaFroniGynbvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf30266e40c04e40051315d09e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/mJTR596FgDn5e-s9jYiJ3C76i4E>
Cc: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dbound] comments on draft-deccio-domain-name-relationships-00
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:28:22 -0000

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:19:30PM -0400, Casey Deccio wrote:
>
> > to endorse PSL use for one purpose or other, but it does speak of the
> > concepts (i.e., so-called "public"/"private" suffixes) introduced by the
> > PSL, as well a PSL-like registry to implement those concepts, as part of
> a
> > solution.
>
> I am not even a little bit convinced that the distinction is part of
> any solution.


Are you saying that there is no solution that can effectively use a
public/private distinction of names to determine whether or not there is
some sort of policy relationship between them?

Casey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email