IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dbound] The proposals before us

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9473612D734 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEH5vYeFvj9I for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970D512D752 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z8so13968996ywa.1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vEjzfN1f9qaEt2uDUcKgZ3AhXuqoBXF1w3axSdOtGmA=; b=XFXrYLuRG2SD5gcQQm907muM4NSpUVEnO2uGDgKeT7kFdQ26Mc4443HZ151foW+ssf t+/imB2JNPvZ4aUYT5q55CKIaivk6N2i/nPsianZmIVHDK0zGMF6v2bmbbxigXXqvEqL kOSsxkynYxbDzZypFqhQhTJWKNAzztMPB7/IrGQ+QksTC6YYHrO7FtCZ27zuQl/7d9ZC dSF7H5sa+ZBG6yD5rFsQldhtZm92zuOi6zgaDhUDLGvrV2rhaSOfjiyC2tmWpFaVWAAE WArThxNVO7zZUH5HY40SPaaIJiZO3KY4HvG8gORlhdEWlzJlJZxcRbZw1v2i2AwFKc5q 3E2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vEjzfN1f9qaEt2uDUcKgZ3AhXuqoBXF1w3axSdOtGmA=; b=E1f1VUwBKBQa4eX1yzyRj1F7IQYZzje6Ephp5u5A1zC/X2BMmuo4V+Kez/o3cvqG0L iabi7QQDtdmm5B0CzHKcnKfM+N7HVeJ+HTlFGU8IvbeEE/BgAFF37jkkpEQ/UkbyeSnY R/aBNLTDGu1h+EeD6x3ipU2qeQ1z9CoAZ7sYbivRIWb4pMdZAqYN0GKNdoj4ue0yv+4k 7niboouwJUyoEAOpqqoHSVuFLh32QHcRRxZUl1VroMMU5OZlZ7Zw1hGyILciZP1+hN+L DBiJfMSVCRGd7KC7Yx7aKo2zl8ZqgxUe0GFq31FkqgBoEnJmfMloLeQcVn7wUDLLsUY+ P1ww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNUZsXC3Bvo2uMj4lJGnfWHRZRFlMxga9aLqWNPPbQ+evyN4UcI5A1pUt/oMFn/168D7nib2wR7RyVuLw==
X-Received: by 10.13.219.13 with SMTP id d13mr3739409ywe.61.1472572601612; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.61.6 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 08:56:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYQcNLk7=4=W=vcVwLcMA8JSaKYAKoNGsKP6yQ13qD=Yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dbound@ietf.org" <dbound@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fb58cd33ef8053b4c06a8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/_L-WKBKZbeFtLJUQxPrgC0-FJrQ>
Subject: [dbound] The proposals before us
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:16:18 -0000

OK, let's get going.  It's time to make progress or die.

The proposals before us:

* ODUP (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deccio-dbound-organizational-domain-policy/
)
* John Levine's proposal (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dbound-dns/)
* SOPA (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sullivan-domain-policy-authority/)

Given that we are now constraining ourselves to dealing with the email case
only, do we have a clear preference for one of these to adopt and develop?
As I recall, we (especially the authors) all had homework to review these
under this new scope constraint and provide critical feedback with a goal
of making a selection of some kind for the working group to develop.  Does
anyone have such comments to get us moving here?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email