Re: [dbound] The proposals before us

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <> Thu, 01 September 2016 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B58012D9C0 for <>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiGWXkCTo9NL for <>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::261]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8826312D581 for <>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id 11so4786443qtc.2 for <>; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=tjMRQqfn29R7ENsqcbhQ0Qg7xe9dxTSxtlC9l014JFM=; b=JyhxXlq0V3lWtRSa2gK+V9cRv6hWJUaLdTVtO8ArjzT/TskkLO+EZriXGptceYdYtg 21ls8MvnEhHsO6okdRiu8Hd2qTSlvdY1e4Wyb0PiT6rvazdNhh28z8fZEGqGnZagc8zM mKMtwSzAFsZJ+cPVVxn3FU8VtNB1U2xDFw3NmS2XEGmQAu4zyPU/HHJYMy+MJtip6zIe z4phwhPnqDAn/4Y8PzeFLUp2ZyRxyGfiD++2Y+KPTVoHV4Ue/UaJITBDCtv7NZBBA0h4 ntD9/3W/SUEyxdDmg2X6V9KfDIXEfYCHv9y4Z9JCZfCSpDHJyl3Ac3Jp/ejNfQMJ5Q3b TTGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=tjMRQqfn29R7ENsqcbhQ0Qg7xe9dxTSxtlC9l014JFM=; b=HAvK1NztwA6SqC1P4DFGlfI1WX/YzOM3fJfv1EYIi1wRP4WlLsIJYQ/dai69iOCXnY QNwTAGUDBn3hs98RD9Fmi3yzNDFHfjL/e+uSOWKE/dSG2+X+FiJzAesC+MdjFaevBAmy EC6gTJUhW+BlLNiH4BlsGe4i4VjIVQBX2/CKTuthDkVQktUACyI39b/A76rA92/wK0Kp e1N/91GF/m5jz7SK3bYWwzvWyRQFZchyVSgrbdC456AFHRwnEpERteyaf74iz+OOv0Uz XOmG8n4GSmqPkOMqG5bDAA8r5v/yDSujW8VYPQOVK1ASsPSw+uADuLE4z5mejxgs7SDW /Uig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNhyqbLWg76kbuvhlvkKJ+Y5L6LW64zE6fRUjVF4I6HVf/JAa7/qxJxwgqG3Kbhcbe4Wjo+k1JIGC/DYM24MPKU8aCT
X-Received: by with SMTP id c1mr17388423qkd.53.1472741007298; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by with ESMTPS id q72sm908171qka.4.2016. (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Sep 2016 07:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (brn1wnexchm01 []) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u81EhQUU024955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:43:26 -0400
Received: from ([::1]) by ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:43:26 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [dbound] The proposals before us
Thread-Index: AQHSAtnatmsQEHcT00mdHkRUb8L0BaBktpyw
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:43:25 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A46D882BRN1WNEXMBX01vc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dbound] The proposals before us
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:43:31 -0000

From: dbound [] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:57 AM
Subject: [dbound] The proposals before us

OK, let's get going.  It's time to make progress or die.
The proposals before us:
* ODUP (
* John Levine's proposal (
* SOPA (
Given that we are now constraining ourselves to dealing with the email case only, do we have a clear preference for one of these to adopt and develop?  As I recall, we (especially the authors) all had homework to review these under this new scope constraint and provide critical feedback with a goal of making a selection of some kind for the working group to develop.  Does anyone have such comments to get us moving here?
My team has implemented a proof of concept of ODUP and tested it with some hacking in Firefox and Postfix. It seems to work just fine.