Re: [dbound] The proposals before us

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 09 September 2016 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B27512B12A for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8w-lHynzwhQ for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E3E412B0F1 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 52658 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2016 01:32:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2016 01:32:30 -0000
Date: 9 Sep 2016 01:32:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20160909013209.39252.qmail@ary.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dbound@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiTpa+5URazZeUNwizkx_ohVkgmk_XPZP3gm7k7PrWaY9w@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/n42gmt-fGLco1C4D34d5DHwbvR4>
Cc: casey@deccio.net
Subject: Re: [dbound] The proposals before us
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 01:32:34 -0000

In article <CAEKtLiTpa+5URazZeUNwizkx_ohVkgmk_XPZP3gm7k7PrWaY9w@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 4:57 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> ODUP: first party publication with TXT records, can work but has a lot
>> of stuff not useful for the mail application.
>
>You mean it supports the addition of policy-defining directives in the
>future?  Yup.  I don't think there's a lot of overhead there. ...

I have more opinions, but before expressing them I'd like to see
whether anyone other than the two of us is paying attention.

R's,
John