Re: [Detnet] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 17 February 2021 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE1B3A1D4E; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:00:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=GaoG7Me0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=eA3Gcone
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EldYr7HnWR_u; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:00:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B1B3A1D71; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437955C0159; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:00:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:00:15 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=LTXeKnx7KxHfYehXT1UC3+I GetY7mu0khzqWAUOsBAc=; b=GaoG7Me0JEKNyt3icUPh8Lb9uAnZpNVR8zbK64N fU6iwQUchIhzre4bduTPk40BvjzDviSyzmN6oozqUSdP0sa16b9kFjZ1U8Z9avOH EHVhIoy4CjQq9INBhXi/R6dtOmg2zCF/ufG1Y8n/OOoFF+jMfgCdfriKiis/OfWc Byr909YtPfHAfsNlBfOInTX6YlMElVCIITwq4qMOCNogTtns7qHjngxi1T2DuHQr oVyk+aDW0f8yxK1pVfNl+H5jxRx1t4/+tIf0m1YS5oSj7S7GGTsTWDR7GivohoxZ EbjjsZk+PqXAfm7caFrgbyzEY8Nwd7MDimPdISg5J/Tyciw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=LTXeKn x7KxHfYehXT1UC3+IGetY7mu0khzqWAUOsBAc=; b=eA3GconeFFwLY+qWJjEz9V qJ1yOVDtCWBeNL497zG1JoJj7T90ZqEaVlUWn65+x/O9rHfShJ+4oIueMFSHW2rZ E6MQge9zgFEKTvNUAS/ESxRx9KswNQL4EwPrtAA8WUhc5OiZGSKma4JbbI6cWbAv n0YUTO4jGdJb7WtiNO1qyB2iMEOxillTLWdOPQB4qml5xOImYtc3d8rfzr/pfmsP nJHmVU+Jj1f3MZ6Sp5udQO7aBhw0Xali8xScUBxU8WxxV7PnSOV0wkCQVeYnwyUP PY1Yx1hTeim3Fusf/pDPm0r6Rr1B9OpYvcC93zyYsYYsjyn88qFFujJSQjXJzGlw ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:3oMtYKRbA_H0qfxMKREJrtmrMCsEZN682mThlHfWTa6wHL7BL0wjLw> <xme:3oMtYLxaqzaX7frlQdViVh8vtkU84x3tZp_dKQbuBlrsfRGquRU4wrb1QWolwFOGA YG0d8s9H6RHBZhQnw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjedvgdduudekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepgeegffefuddvffeflefgheektdeigfehffdtteetieeffefhfedugeduuedv vefhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrd ektdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegr lhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3oMtYKDajWpaUhrc09mfZtVQTKS1sh8HCBeUjHDlBmXHUqgDMx3uGw> <xmx:3oMtYHG2BU9NuKHtsnZX-WZw1qHy8c6ke9xXjZAmlM0tIO3TlKTsZw> <xmx:3oMtYBMJonz708Y8ikVYx89kRPaFEedQ0n4nbX8fPTH2Pm1SGzWsDA> <xmx:34MtYEvpAOzKWJVW8o5CmaDBePABu1rk188Gsg4JMH5VYD8lRopkQQ>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.80]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8A031080066; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:00:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <3507CAFB-CFB6-49AB-8158-3B5DDBA4464B@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A955F188-F060-49A0-B1A0-D2FC52DD1CDA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:00:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUc16+AMmM2Uyy_D5zk_cp7WP+Uuhw7d9K=v3FZUkgcL1g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Bal=C3=A1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <161256940254.7027.5506274353118325656@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM0PR0702MB360397F9EF91321816EEE052AC8F9@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAP+sJUc16+AMmM2Uyy_D5zk_cp7WP+Uuhw7d9K=v3FZUkgcL1g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/SKFIqDrPkf59Tup2mbPyVYHnAjM>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:00:23 -0000

Ines, thanks for your review. Balázs, thanks for your responses. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Feb 11, 2021, at 6:24 AM, Ines Robles <mariainesrobles=40googlemail.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Balázs,
> 
> Thank you for your clarifications. It is Ok for me. 
> 
> BR, 
> Ines
> 
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:46 PM Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com <mailto:balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> Hi Ines,
> Many thanks for your review. 
> See my reactions and proposed updates below.
> Thanks
> Bala'zs
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> 
> Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2021 12:57 AM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
> Cc: detnet@ietf.org <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn.all@ietf.org>; last-call@ietf.org <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
> Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2021-02-05
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05
> IESG Telechat date: 2021-02-18
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document specifies the Deterministic Networking MPLS data plane when operating over a TSN sub-network.
> 
> I have some minor questions to the authors.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> - Page 5: Could you please describe what the "TSN treatment" comprise?
> 
> <Bala'zs> TSN treatment means to execute TSN functionalities during forwarding. I will extend the text
> OLD TEXT:
>        ... All these functions have to identify flows those 
>        require TSN treatment.
> NEW TEXT:
>        ... All these functions have to identify flows those 
>        require TSN treatment (i.e., applying TSN functions
>        during forwarding).
> END
> 
> - Are the security considerations the same for TSN-unaware that are for TSN-aware nodes? - How are the privacy considerations for those? It would be nice to mention explicitly how or where (I-D.ietf-detnet-security???) the privacy considerations are addressed for TSN-unaware and TSN-aware nodes
> 
> <Bala'zs> The I-D.ietf-detnet-security contains DetNet specific security considerations. TSN-unaware nodes are out-of-scope in the draft. TSN-aware nodes are part of both the MPLS and the TSN domain, where both domain has its own security considerations, which must be applied. 
> 
> Thank you for this document
> 
> Ines.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art