Re: [Detnet] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 15 December 2020 04:18 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C6B3A07BD; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:18:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSviepgTzPHN; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:18:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 754FA3A0755; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id q1so17993978ilt.6; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:18:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=B0kGR3uq4s1R5bsiTny8NlUwuvVogtC3Jt1Qyph7Sm4=; b=TSKAHWDHApNdQuiNHpi9LIDkXe9qJpOLI4pu62WYVHQzebaYl/aduPzyW0kBSgAsBD On6sHNeMTGWIkPmSww71uIGGMseged7kY3d6rI2edcj1xXD6V+nmTA8z9Ihy5cJExN/2 6TelxOAVuKQDK1/sDGwMC0ZdPsAaWjBy2m46cZZcNdFmjLLnDqpsyntBKl4pbg0yu1f3 Ew13rwl4JAVip+Pcu9qJOBOUdAVLsBC//4HnOYwM0oOOYJw/0UBSueUaWIhg7eKB0tQb /7hJFI7lBWbxm+9jKGnuGW/sy8Uw2k/OePC0sUDdO8FMvRXn2V5U7MB6/Mex3LmrsBTQ Q3GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=B0kGR3uq4s1R5bsiTny8NlUwuvVogtC3Jt1Qyph7Sm4=; b=sAcVqwonsyX2PSlnvj5rendKQQczkeLgm3dqPmBxDS/8CNWDl0RovF6tGNXnn/BLX8 NSAGHzE1Bm3yIvAmforekez0BFYYAtCNptaFOj3rD9hiia7GGB5PTAy56UVjLr7ucehW ddwzOQ45Ipr4g0jzux2oGxMmvHmgIw63+W3jHCuZd9PJYWtYdkoYQBuJC9euqyU8WA0E OoL/5GP/YkajGEQa2Z4aDWerVwN+aC0Krlw0Os3bYXp0H/do8szDxI4iJWi89v+ykJjF ok/sHK8gjaoeTaBEf/iJ/DJBmNUj3l2wQH+bXvyVGxNKfj3m0G2sjQVzPMMZuPLFgzEx 3oqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53024qrKFPtrlPAsilQFZRyMbMRY07jD8aiSVgUjHTgwaYrgyxx0 hYNIWdAukaCkzljycJcruwy3bKbuCnK8ZtweifY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqLwCCSEjO6K/0qidm7uIUyZSi919MHdW7gOz73MY7T/osjCXqOflYpQJkm3O4/z36XphFi/GuIBOovR4h3Is=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:155b:: with SMTP id v88mr38491564ilk.303.1608005881629; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:18:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160678067159.28408.14361941644291379180@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM0PR0702MB360392403C13062660CB2B66ACC70@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR0702MB360392403C13062660CB2B66ACC70@AM0PR0702MB3603.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:17:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAM4esxQBeEdoxShWg5unBpk+j_TqC1GZtLD8vZcNHu-5WyA93Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bal=C3=A1zs_Varga_A?= <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org>, "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f11fe05b6790b4f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/kJlTP8Wolu_sAAtC20Qo2yzEfjo>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 04:18:05 -0000

Roger, thanks.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:53 AM Balázs Varga A <balazs.a.varga@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Many thanks for the comments.
> - NAT: in my understanding tsvart comment was resolved by adding a note to
> the end of chapter 5.
> (see my mail:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Bl7A4-2DztDmFlxL56MED_5RexY/
> )
> - abstract: right, that sentence needs fixing
> OLD TEXT
>    The approach is modeled on the operation of MPLS and over
>    UDP/IP packet switched networks.
> NEW TEXT
>    The approach is based on the operation of MPLS-in-UDP
>    technology.
> END
>
> Many thanks
> Bala'zs
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 12:58 AM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip@ietf.org; detnet-chairs@ietf.org;
> detnet@ietf.org; Ethan Grossman <eagros@dolby.com>om>; eagros@dolby.com
> Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with COMMENT)
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please address the tsvart review comment about NATs.
>
> The sentence in the abstract that begins "The approach is..." is garbled.
>
>
>
>