Re: [Detnet] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

Roger, thanks.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:53 AM Balázs Varga A <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Many thanks for the comments.
> - NAT: in my understanding tsvart comment was resolved by adding a note to
> the end of chapter 5.
> (see my mail:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Bl7A4-2DztDmFlxL56MED_5RexY/
> )
> - abstract: right, that sentence needs fixing
> OLD TEXT
>    The approach is modeled on the operation of MPLS and over
>    UDP/IP packet switched networks.
> NEW TEXT
>    The approach is based on the operation of MPLS-in-UDP
>    technology.
> END
>
> Many thanks
> Bala'zs
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 12:58 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; Ethan Grossman <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: Martin Duke's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: (with COMMENT)
>
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-07: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please address the tsvart review comment about NATs.
>
> The sentence in the abstract that begins "The approach is..." is garbled.
>
>
>
>