[Detnet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05

Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 29 January 2021 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14A53A1042; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:58:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: detnet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161193228969.11828.13727269090543263879@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Vijay Gurbani <vijay.gurbani@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:58:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/nyiCJDAtha7nTfa34w_aFIyrmDo>
Subject: [Detnet] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:58:10 -0000

Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2021-01-29
IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready to be published as a Proposed Standard. 

Generally, the I-D is quite heavy on acronyms, some of which I suspect 
comes with the domain the I-D targets.  While I suspect that most
readers versed in the area will not have any problems expanding the
acronyms, I just wanted to mention this for the authors to perhaps
do a once-over to see if any acronyms need expansion.  (I list a couple
in the Nits section.)

Major issues:  0

Minor issues:  0

Nits/editorial comments: 2

- Figure 2: - What is "Tnl"? (Tunnel?)
            - What does "AC" mean?
- IDnits is reporting a couple of unused references ([RFC5921] and
  [RFC8660]), and that draft-ietf-detnet-mpls has been published as
  RFC 8964.