[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing-05

[Mike Blanche <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

This proposal appears very similar to ITU-T Recommendation Y.3129, which I
believe was developed by some of the same authors.

https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.3129-202404-I/en

The abstract text of the I-D is virtually identical to the summary of
Y.3129. In addition, significant parts of the content are very similar -
e.g. parts of section 6.3 of the draft are word-for-word the same as parts
of section 8 of the ITU-T Recommendation.

The ITU-T Recommendation is missing from the draft's References section.

I am unclear why we are considering duplicating work that appears to be
already completed at the ITU.

Best regards,

Mike

On Fri, 5 Dec 2025 at 15:49, Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> This email begins a 4-week adoption poll for:
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05/
>
>
>
> No IPR has been disclosed for this document.
>
>
>
> Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
>
> list by the end of the day (any time zone) January 2nd.
>
>
>
> As a reminder this document is part of the larger set of adoption calls
>
> of the documents discussed at IETF 124:
>
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-deadline-based-forwarding/18
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism/13
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/09
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-glbf/06
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-ontime-forwarding/04
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> János (as Co-chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>