RE: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter

Ralph,

I think we need to add something to the charter for Mobility and Prefix delegation for IPv6.  I think this team and group can do a lot of good and help with evolution of wireless networks and the integration of Mobile.  Specifically:

- Determine the requirements for DHC to support the dynamic renumbering of networks using fast path delegaion as CPE front end between ISP and Private Networks.

What do others think?  I just think we have work to do in this space and not sorted it all out yet.  But do we have to for a charter?

thanks
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 8:27 AM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter
> 
> 
> The Internet ADs have suggested it is time (likely
> *way* past time) to revisit the DHC WG charter.  Here's a 
> first pass at
> what I see as the issues currently in front of the WG.  The 
> objectives are
> not presented in any particular order.
> 
> Please review and send your comments to the mailing list.  The goal is
> to have consensus on a list of objectives for final review at the WG
> meeting in Yokohama.
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> =====
> 
> The working group has the following primary objectives:
> 
> * Develop additional authentication protocols within the framework
>   defined in RFC3118, along with other mechanisms to mitigate the
>   threat of attacks on DHCP clients and servers:
>   - New RFC3118 protocols to address improved key management and
>     improved scalability
>   - Provide security for messages passed between relay agents and
>     servers
>   - Consider solutions for specific threats such as use of nonce
>     identifier to defend against DoS attacks through FORCERENEW from
>     off-path attackers
> 
> * Complete the specification of DHCP for IPv6 (DHCPv6):
>   - Gain acceptance and publication of current Internet Draft as
>     Proposed Standard
>   - Develop and publish specifications for options and other
>     extensions to DHCPv6, including those already published as
>     Internet Drafts:
>     + "DNS Configuration Options for DHCPv6"
>     + "Time Configuration Options for DHCPv6"
>     + "NIS Configuration Options for DHCPv6"
>     + "DSTM Ports Option for DHCPv6", "DSTM Options for DHCPv6"
>     + "Load Balancing for DHCPv6"
>   - Encourage independent implementations and conduct interoperability
>     testing
>   - Revise specification and publish for acceptance as Draft Standard
>     by 6/30/2002
>   - Develop extensions to DHCPv6 for prefix delegation, DNS
>     configuration, etc.
> 
> * Revise and submit the DHCP specification for acceptance as a Full
>   Standard
> 
> * Complete the specification and publish work in progress as
>   standards:
>   - Failover protocol
>   - DHCP/DDNS interaction
>   - SNMP MIB
>   - Host name options
>   - Other client and relay agent options
> 
> * Review new options for DHCP, as deemed appropriate by the working
>   group and/or the Internet area directors
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg