Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter

Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> Tue, 22 October 2002 19:27 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01474 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g9MJTic01530 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:29:44 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MJTiv01527 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:29:44 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01439 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MJRVv01420; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:27:32 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MJQuv01382 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:26:56 -0400
Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01354 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:24:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (northrelay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.151]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g9MJQgUF265268; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:26:42 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (rotala.raleigh.ibm.com [9.27.12.14]) by northrelay03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.3/NCO/VER6.4) with ESMTP id g9MJQdUd066190; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:26:40 -0400
Received: from rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (narten@localhost) by rotala.raleigh.ibm.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9MJNxk01087; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:23:59 -0400
Message-Id: <200210221923.g9MJNxk01087@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
To: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
cc: "Ralph Droms" <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHC WG charter
In-Reply-To: Message from "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com> of "Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:11:00 EDT." <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B02BE962E@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:23:59 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

> This looks good.  I must have missed it but I don't see prefix
> delegation?  Is that within the options?   Or do we move that to IPv6
> WG?   This is very important work required.

I agree that it is important work.

In practice it needs to be joint between IPv6 and DHC. I don't have
strong opinions on whether it is more appropriate to list it as a DHC
item vs. one in the IPv6 WG. I believe *they* believe they should own
it. :-)

Thomas
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg