Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6

Hi Vijay,

why do you think a static route option is needed at all?
For the sake of autoconfiguration it is better to keep the routing 
information in the routers and to provide only a default router to the host 
(which is done through the router advertisements). In the case that the 
router is not the best choice for a specific route, the router will  send 
an ICMP redirect message to the corresponding host, to inform about a 
better router for this route.

Regards
Martin

--On Dienstag, Januar 15, 2002 20:05:56 +0530 Vijayabhaskar A K 
<vijayak@india.hp.com> wrote:

> I have gone through the dhcpv6 22 spec.
> I felt that, static route option (option 33 in RFC 2132) is missing.
> which is useful for routing. Can we include this option
> also in the spec?
> thanks and regards
> Vijay
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg