IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] recommendation on DHCP6 source port numbers

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 29 February 2024 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DACDC1519B1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oFmnF8tiXqrQ for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [204.87.183.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD746C1519B0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 686F6E5F28; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=PbOxxshj0WNhRd9U dEq7UxEqCJ7xLZHV8dhYJNY+kUQ=; b=ThHLePUVJjR1VQLDT3heQ4mcw+axOuJ3 q0zzK3Atk/6ZIx2bqY0PudBWMjPvABkq4G4JBioI8IGX7kqieN1pHvnrcmBI0BG0 AQNDKR6deac7aMWq+ycqX/VSMq3957rTyuT7UgxRlcIzCsIxAuE21Ao9DIWIMtmd L0092S32KyjgPVxMr87b1U790lfFdM6epCXvnNYxiefq2kn4qbPx6uHFV9zzVMj7 r0+svNMfoze4kH+ZhYUyMoKUWaGfqechiDP4Qlcng8JYcx1uLDTQtnsOxe/h614v m825Xqf8ptLluix5daViajio3Nw/sBr/FUUGrrETLLCyXPPjYSzCXw==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 45F54E5F09; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ti0389q160-5480.bb.online.no [95.34.1.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B95E4E11B59; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <BAB1070B-E2B3-4430-B355-871B8AE1AEDF@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 17:03:16 +0100
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Tomoyuki Sahara <tsahara@iij.ad.jp>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7031AD5E-97AB-42FF-99B5-DFD32F8FD665@employees.org>
References: <44363ABD-3FF1-4EA6-9E4D-85152467F24D@employees.org> <BAB1070B-E2B3-4430-B355-871B8AE1AEDF@gmail.com>
To: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2iM-BSWfHGVUUK6oTnEYE-DudKI>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] recommendation on DHCP6 source port numbers
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:03:33 -0000

Bernie,

> DHCPv6 has been successfully deployed and this is the first I recall of this kind of discussion/issue.
> You would likely also invalidate a lot of implementations with such a change, which is not really in line with advancing this to Full Standard.

It’s a lot more important to have the specification clear and unambiguous. I think it has been shown that it isn’t.
Happy with whatever solution there is consensus for, but the ambiguity has to be resolved I think.

O.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email