IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] recommendation on DHCP6 source port numbers

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 29 February 2024 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA117C14F6A3 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:39:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wv-JN1-vI4Xq for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:39:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [204.87.183.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04FBC14F6A0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C1789E6E79; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=/AqRbaMnu4eFNoUM 9krpK3LQycGdGEKKlHy+Lzpva54=; b=VtrVwZK7wznFBv12ou4bKsrTFbQf1jqZ 6D6NDJG9RdcCGhLHSjH8MJCtKxAEVpq0mWWkTurc+cT36Zo1C9tR+xb73Occ0FYA KtOSLK+5RgBUcXNwPL6ntIZIhWpX9AOXVRQzmdfMTjYwZKiWM9+EftpDq3FxFw79 xE/JfwvNAL63/X0d2oXDlM6ylGpitLh9sSAUiagBo/yCwPDLM6zb/vKMHCjxo8Lk lNfNIlZsnC1CoK90MHFAoKtppeeb2J5RjlfduNGWSiGwl0iHxPexrAAj5NnJvxUU XJeNsmkARBiat3hKxJAyHuAr9BUoyttsa0hh4WXeTWKroGzHJ1Yldw==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A39DFE6E77; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ti0389q160-5480.bb.online.no [95.34.1.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8D344E11AD4; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:39:25 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <AECB956C-7501-462D-A05C-33E76635277F@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:39:13 +0100
Cc: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D058C3A5-39DE-43E5-AD0D-AD04B224D34D@employees.org>
References: <CC99EB8A-3350-4682-B273-D0656AD8F7F4@employees.org> <AECB956C-7501-462D-A05C-33E76635277F@gmail.com>
To: Bernie Volz <bevolz@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/d5U_OLK4sYrQ7xGQ6bySJU-ll_c>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] recommendation on DHCP6 source port numbers
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 18:39:31 -0000

> No. I think that will mean folks will expect it and that is not the intent. I think the revised text is sufficient.

Why is that not the intent?
Do you know of any other UDP application that behaves the way were source and destination ports are not inverse of each other?
(apart from tunnels where they are used for load balancing).

O.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email