IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 04:52 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131471A01FA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:52:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LkAo0CeVGr0O for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511381A0199 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:52:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13149; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1421988751; x=1423198351; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1HYIWFOb8kisvTapkASm18jWgt/YUDUkHHv5nnH9KQI=; b=lfT4CdFFz5uVYh2qUMtBcw0siFxRaYMeYnzDIXaDoLBApUYTYVCySQ45 wSsJnLpgdCrBixlKd2nfJZGNJazoAjq/4Y5NOtEzVmTsPPvTQtqGAUyaL 7P5Xs4UZRm5eu5QrfYXjoZkXJVHOn4uqO48dKiScAGp2MXylv+CLXxej6 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AyCADU0sFU/5BdJa1agkNDUlgExFmBaYVxAoEWQwEBAQEBfYQMAQEBBC1cAgEIEQQBAQsdByERFAkIAQEEARIIiBADEQ3NXA2EZQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReNToFZAQEeNwGDFoETBY0GgWCDSoQLglg2gkiIMYI1gz0igjKBPG8BgQs5fgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.09,453,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="390050857"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2015 04:52:30 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0N4qUnE004565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:52:30 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.3]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 22:52:29 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy
Thread-Index: AdA2cQ5NVqtoN7eTR0euEuM71YWMFgAUjJwAAAEt2rA=
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:52:29 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7C05D4@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7BE04B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <54c1d125.431b6b0a.6596.0dac@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <54c1d125.431b6b0a.6596.0dac@mx.google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7C05D4xmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/8FN37RuZq0Du2lY0fQsPxLrg3z4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:52:39 -0000

I believe these would be Informational as they will not propose anything to implement.

They presently are specified as being Standards Track - we would probably want to make sure they are adopted as Informational.

Other drafts being worked on will document how one might mitigate some or all of these privacy concerns.


-        Bernie

From: Leaf Yeh [mailto:leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:43 PM
To: Bernie Volz (volz); dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy

Q: Will these 2 drafts be put into standard track?


Best Regards,
Leaf


From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:38 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy


Hello:



During the Honolulu IETF-91 meeting, there was consensus to adopt the following documents as working group items:

draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy-00  Privacy considerations for DHCP

draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-00      Privacy considerations for DHCPv6



If you do NOT favor the adoption of one or both, please reply to this mail and also state your objections. This adoption call will end on Feb 4, 2015, and unless we hear objections, these documents will be adopted.



You may also indicate your support for adopting them, but because of the WG meeting consensus, this is not necessary.



The HTML version of the documents can be viewed at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy-00 and http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-00.



Thanks!



- Tomek & Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email