Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy

"Leaf Yeh" <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 04:42 UTC

Return-Path: <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714841A020D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDrnmGkBoF2l for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1121A0187 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id tr6so5361362ieb.4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:thread-index:content-language; bh=FW/VkG04J6QtqJoyH7roAbiYXuC3POJnBne/KInjPu4=; b=ZaTPsyLXLNuSw5gsu2Nzp8if6D5i/mDSZIMUpFOHOnWOKw9oCLj71RFZ5vawiOzj3/ 5Drp3A4tDA1CMHuLcurxPveONSNtSnv0dcht+y7R/sW8gSf0HjP35o18BTHYibWSMrh4 GDttZp8fLjgAocUW3C9rAwI6KqbUVgFGVQrK0LrfTEEtAx+ENw9uqW/IsZyH73L4vvCv jf8haL8ubz9jAx6Tt0AHWouukygQSFtnIfbpLE81s6edltq7yeAeDUnev2OlBQgIQ4CZ oz51Xo3e+a+x8cNjTLNXToFE5FczPXyiOmurhzFOfZM8P17otlLRHXp1J5X7f7VOUop+ m81Q==
X-Received: by 10.42.213.7 with SMTP id gu7mr7011159icb.47.1421988133907; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PC ([218.241.109.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b64sm297928iob.42.2015.01.22.20.42.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:42:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54c1d125.431b6b0a.6596.0dac@mx.google.com>
X-Google-Original-Message-ID: <000c01d036c7$06f33ba0$14d9b2e0$@yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
From: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
To: "'Bernie Volz (volz)'" <volz@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7BE04B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1B7BE04B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:42:40 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01D0370A.15167BA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AdA2cQ5NVqtoN7eTR0euEuM71YWMFgAUjJwA
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/Gr5TRUneegv7Smrk5CnGTSwdcSA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy & draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:42:17 -0000

Q: Will these 2 drafts be put into standard track?

 

 

Best Regards,

Leaf

 

 

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 2:38 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy &
draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy

 

Hello:

 

During the Honolulu IETF-91 meeting, there was consensus to adopt the
following documents as working group items:

draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy-00  Privacy considerations for DHCP

draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-00      Privacy considerations for DHCPv6

 

If you do NOT favor the adoption of one or both, please reply to this mail
and also state your objections. This adoption call will end on Feb 4, 2015,
and unless we hear objections, these documents will be adopted.

 

You may also indicate your support for adopting them, but because of the WG
meeting consensus, this is not necessary.

 

The HTML version of the documents can be viewed at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-dhcp-privacy-00 and http://tools.
ietf.org/html/draft-krishnan-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-00.

 

Thanks!

 

- Tomek & Bernie