Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3C1131C3B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2DPZE4ZTeF6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB3D12ECC0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6J9AQ8H019198; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:10:26 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3442A2066CE; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:10:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE13200F37; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:10:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.51] ([132.166.84.51]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6J9APgX026539; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:10:25 +0200
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, =?UTF-8?B?VsOtemRhbCBBbGXFoQ==?= <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <149869621720.6575.278128190348174876@ietfa.amsl.com> <3285281858d043649d507b6bda7b8646@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <1f94b780-59c1-42ce-936d-0c8a71143444@gmail.com> <37917a26062f4e4c9715d324604e4d01@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <5fdc7054-7012-30ee-dec7-618f3cd3646f@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=8Aibz0qWib=RiCr510i6DeGGZSOFNnWG0h-mguUzgqA@mail.gmail.com> <6f811cd2-61f1-05c2-1ede-b6933fa1dbb3@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=0_U3en3zAJbO0fMxKv32iFYLcTVqn6bO5zm6XjT3+iQ@mail.gmail.com> <0ea332fc-79a0-4ae9-50fc-465f2389157a@gmail.com> <CC675F8E-BCA7-4937-8A26-A5CA227C56C8@t-mobile.cz> <243e84a0-2804-d1a3-2d9d-4969c83e81df@gmail.com> <6606c293c34d405e8153273a4bdeb357@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1nCjEB5vgejn9CjO6y9PU_WqBn41PpvofF1h_ATv3_GmA@mail.gmail.com> <bc49c4e4567d4425af4f83e7136817aa@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1kUGmp-87MeV0kf9rfGp85ux8RNpENCL1pknybWs_MPNQ@mail.gmail.com> <28fcee88f7354927b521c822b50277c6@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1mt51V4aHTs46S71qRpoz0iwpAyxq0_YqHX=AtRDa+x-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <56aee165-9dd3-7633-a3bb-9d62b469b48a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:10:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mt51V4aHTs46S71qRpoz0iwpAyxq0_YqHX=AtRDa+x-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/A9kk8p1QMhzpsghnLV_1lz4gO5o>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:10:33 -0000

Ted,

Let me explain.  I no longer have a request for the spec 3315bis.  Sorry
for the intrusion.

Le 18/07/2017 à 11:07, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> He later said that he'd observed this behavior when using the ISC 
> DHCP client.   My theory is that this is an artifact of the way the 
> ISC DHCP client transmits packets on the network, and not a problem 
> with the tunneling protocol.   It would be nice to validate that 
> conjecture.

We work on this conjencture, but it takes time, because it involves many
people, I am the only who speaks, and some times wrongly.  Now I prefer
to stay silent until I get some resolution to talk about.

Until then, all I can say is that I have packet dumps that show
encapsulation, and ICMP hoplimit exceeded, and that the DHCP Solicit had
hoplimit 1.  It is however not clear whether or not that's anybody's fault.

This is not a matter of someone's fault; the goal is to make it work.

I am sorry for the confusion this may have created.

Alex