Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation - src LL vs GUA

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0431F1293FD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:03:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iJbMEXZfjfZm for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:03:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E1A3128D3E for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:03:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2993; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1510740219; x=1511949819; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xggurzpsQHPpdPEgJB9uzwDeUdUK36IWqmwXomfJCG0=; b=ZY7NusjnfJyLhuLzH2kwyVxaFhp9VnVUPNWfGROfRbmc6gmU5a/OcjgM /zMENz8GeRJgk+Ru4SiiCGQ3vX3o74vAYgq9RJf3I1FAySbXgIgxl5x6m X1AjXFdBMvCFYI3/FRf9lScysR2fn7Ak+cdESK1rZJd1saxNHqtY9IQJC 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C/AACXEAxa/4wNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM2ZG4ng3+KH48hkw6FSYIRChgBCoUYAhqEbT8YAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFHwIBAwEBIUsLEAIBCAQBNgQDAgICJQsUEQIEDgWJQGQQp1+CJ4sXAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDNIIHg2eDAYUvgn4xgjIFkXGQRgKVBJNElgA?= =?us-ascii?q?CERkBgTgBHziBdHoVSS0BgjaDEYFOd4hhAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,398,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="320842168"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Nov 2017 10:03:36 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAFA3a5d013113 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:03:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:03:36 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:03:36 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Roy Marples <roy@marples.name>
CC: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation - src LL vs GUA
Thread-Index: AQHTSBpFO3Bh3/i+xk+Llo298YhKFKLpuoSAgABdvgD//7IAAIAAajsA//+x0nCAAHb8gP//rpBgACVlRID///xCAIAqGgNegABp84CAAA4AgP//nI/1
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:03:36 +0000
Message-ID: <FD4C36E2-6C5A-43E5-864E-AF7AD6D25B87@cisco.com>
References: <149869621720.6575.278128190348174876@ietfa.amsl.com> <3285281858d043649d507b6bda7b8646@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <1f94b780-59c1-42ce-936d-0c8a71143444@gmail.com> <37917a26062f4e4c9715d324604e4d01@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <d944ac55-d67d-d7d4-8eeb-f60438fdda2d@gmail.com> <35558A79-C176-4D71-9E91-4BDB19DDD006@cisco.com> <67ba54d2-d53f-82bf-93c9-1b92631ef4e8@gmail.com> <86409a9acb7846ddbdff42c58328e7d6@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <eccd5dd2-3542-fdbc-89a2-7d13d563163d@gmail.com> <2fbc8325961c49a1944e3ee216fcb032@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <a3f9cd45-403a-c6f6-6e9a-98a9b651a339@gmail.com> <4c25045f863a4e368f58a5a4a3917bde@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <37918108-c5ed-a82d-2d97-227388ec25d0@gmail.com> <1A785964-1088-4081-B7DC-58E3CD9B0605@cisco.com> <9bad26dc5b2d42ee9cca47adb32eedc0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <DB4FB172-B3CB-4471-9E07-A4CEE34D6A82@fugue.com> <f5b1fdd0-407f-c4ef-d937-dfd3ad909b47@marples.name> <CAPt1N1nh0rfi+zhc+emu4V1sZk+hgDpJGKBW_uVNdxp-GuJYMw@mail.gmail.com>, <c7f1410a-f6ab-0551-d586-9d6c9e04a093@marples.name>
In-Reply-To: <c7f1410a-f6ab-0551-d586-9d6c9e04a093@marples.name>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_FD4C36E26C5A43E5864EAF7AD6D25B87ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/xYcyhqK_YGqv9CKqdKcjZcDFGa4>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation - src LL vs GUA
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:03:48 -0000

If I understand you, there is no requirement that unicast be used & so the servers (upstreams) are broken.

- Bernie (from iPhone)

On Nov 15, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Roy Marples <roy@marples.name<mailto:roy@marples.name>> wrote:

On 15/11/2017 09:09, Ted Lemon wrote:
I would have to review, but isn't unicast support optional?

Yes it is as written in the RFC.

However, during development of dhcpcd there are at least two upstreams who don't renew if it's not unicast when the unicast option is given.

Roy

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg