Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:47:31AM -0400, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> Thanks Ted for the response on this draft.
> 
> However, it doesn't look good -- you're the only one to have responded.

Yes, it doesn't.

Please folks, we need more responses! These drafts are fairly trivial and
easy to ready, so please read them and respond TODAY.

If you are happy with them you still need to response. No response does
not mean positive support. Of course you should also respond if you are
not happy.

The two drafts are:

	draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt
	draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt

Last calls for both end at 1700 EST today.

Stig

> 
> And I don't have an responses on the remote-id draft
> (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt).
> 
> - Bernie 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com] 
> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:52 PM
> > To: Bernie Volz (volz)
> > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on 
> > <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
> > 
> > Er, thanks for the reminder.   Yes, we need this draft to happen.    
> > Remote ID functionality is very useful.   Apologies for not  
> > responding sooner.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg