IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 20 July 2005 11:53 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvD8H-0003tJ-4Y; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:53:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvD8F-0003rw-6q for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:52:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA08275 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:52:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvDc3-0004My-M4 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:23:48 -0400
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (st0355.nas941.k-tokyo.nttpc.ne.jp [61.194.57.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E4756948; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 04:52:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
In-Reply-To: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2164E987@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
References: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2164E987@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <9AA9DE0F-5EEA-4F27-A6D1-4091B2D91B85@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:52:26 +0900
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728)
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

The big challenge right now is that nobody is using this stuff, so  
there is no clamor for support.   A year or two from now, there will  
be lots of questions about why the Subscriber ID and Remote ID  
options aren't available for DHCPv6 if we don't advance these drafts  
now, but at the moment nobody is actually using DHCPv6 in production  
at any ISP of which I am aware, and I think that's why nobody is  
treating this as an urgent matter.

I would like to say, for the record, that I support the advancement  
of both these drafts, and I would also like to encourage other WG  
members to state their support for the advancement of these drafts;  
otherwise, when we need them, they will have expired and we will have  
to go through this process again.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email