Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
Josh Littlefield <joshl@cisco.com> Wed, 20 July 2005 17:03 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvHyi-0000dL-1G; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvHyg-0000d7-25 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:26 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09347 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvISX-0001Y7-6d for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:34:18 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2005 13:03:15 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,304,1115006400"; d="scan'208"; a="63204745:sNHT28500212"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6KH3Fk6009191; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:15 -0400
Received: from [161.44.65.247] ([161.44.65.247]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:16 -0400
Message-ID: <42DE83D3.6030505@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:03:15 -0400
From: Josh Littlefield <joshl@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stig Venaas <Stig.Venaas@uninett.no>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
References: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2164E987@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com> <20050720115616.GC10519@storhaugen.uninett.no>
In-Reply-To: <20050720115616.GC10519@storhaugen.uninett.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2005 17:03:16.0105 (UTC) FILETIME=[EBAEA790:01C58D4C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
I support advancement of both these drafts. Having these options defined will be of major importance in some expected early uses of DHCv6. Josh Littlefield Stig Venaas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:47:31AM -0400, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > >>Thanks Ted for the response on this draft. >> >>However, it doesn't look good -- you're the only one to have responded. > > > Yes, it doesn't. > > Please folks, we need more responses! These drafts are fairly trivial and > easy to ready, so please read them and respond TODAY. > > If you are happy with them you still need to response. No response does > not mean positive support. Of course you should also respond if you are > not happy. > > The two drafts are: > > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt > > Last calls for both end at 1700 EST today. > > Stig > > >>And I don't have an responses on the remote-id draft >>(draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt). >> >>- Bernie >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com] >>>Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:52 PM >>>To: Bernie Volz (volz) >>>Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org >>>Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on >>><draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt> >>> >>>Er, thanks for the reminder. Yes, we need this draft to happen. >>>Remote ID functionality is very useful. Apologies for not >>>responding sooner. >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>dhcwg mailing list >>dhcwg@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > > > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg -- ===================================================================== Josh Littlefield Cisco Systems, Inc. joshl@cisco.com 1414 Massachusetts Avenue tel: 978-936-1379 fax: same Boxborough, MA 01719-2205 _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <dra… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Kim Kinnear
- Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on … Josh Littlefield