IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Wed, 20 July 2005 14:12 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvFJ0-0001b6-QY; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:12:14 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DvFIy-0001af-EK for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:12:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA18726 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:12:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DvFmn-00050M-W5 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2005 07:11:49 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,303,1115017200"; d="scan'208"; a="316949274:sNHT858789240"
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6KEBdv3004739 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:11:47 -0400
Received: from kkinnear-w2k03.cisco.com ([161.44.65.121]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:11:47 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20050720100942.01de5038@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: kkinnear@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:11:45 -0400
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
In-Reply-To: <20050720115616.GC10519@storhaugen.uninett.no>
References: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2164E987@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com> <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB2164E987@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2005 14:11:47.0645 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7483ED0:01C58D34]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c
Cc: kkinnear@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

I believe that both of these drafts are useful, and I support
both of them for moving forward through the IETF process.
(So, please consider this single email a positive response
for both drafts.)


        draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt
        draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt


Kim Kinnear


At 07:56 AM 7/20/2005, Stig Venaas wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:47:31AM -0400, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>> Thanks Ted for the response on this draft.
>> 
>> However, it doesn't look good -- you're the only one to have responded.
>
>Yes, it doesn't.
>
>Please folks, we need more responses! These drafts are fairly trivial and
>easy to ready, so please read them and respond TODAY.
>
>If you are happy with them you still need to response. No response does
>not mean positive support. Of course you should also respond if you are
>not happy.
>
>The two drafts are:
>
>        draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt
>        draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt
>
>Last calls for both end at 1700 EST today.
>
>Stig
>
>> 
>> And I don't have an responses on the remote-id draft
>> (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-remoteid-00.txt).
>> 
>> - Bernie 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ted Lemon [mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com] 
>> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 4:52 PM
>> > To: Bernie Volz (volz)
>> > Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
>> > Subject: Re: [dhcwg] NOTICE - dhc WG last call expires on 
>> > <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-00.txt>
>> > 
>> > Er, thanks for the reminder.   Yes, we need this draft to happen.    
>> > Remote ID functionality is very useful.   Apologies for not  
>> > responding sooner.
>> > 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
>_______________________________________________
>dhcwg mailing list
>dhcwg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email