Re: [dhcwg] FW: RFC3315 question

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 02 March 2007 00:12 UTC

Return-path: <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMvOI-00045s-Jl; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:12:54 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMvOG-0003sC-RG for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:12:52 -0500
Received: from shell-ng.nominum.com ([81.200.64.181]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMvOF-0007RY-FH for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:12:52 -0500
Received: from mail.nominum.com (mail.nominum.com [81.200.64.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by shell-ng.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366885693C; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:12:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.4 tests=AWL: -0.675,BAYES_99: 4.07,CUSTOM_RULE_FROM: ALLOW, TOTAL_SCORE: 3.395
X-Spam-Level:
Received: from [10.0.0.190] ([66.93.162.128]) (authenticated user mellon@nominum.com) by mail.nominum.com (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128 bits)); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:12:47 -0800
In-Reply-To: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB21036425D9@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
References: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB21036425D9@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <1362AA99-81E9-4016-B2B9-5AA69D4EC3BF@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] FW: RFC3315 question
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:12:32 -0700
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aefe408d50e9c7c47615841cb314bed
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

On Mar 1, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Bernie Volz ((volz)) wrote:
> Wouldn't we want to say something about that it MUST be the hardware
> type for the interface from which the link-layer address was taken?

Yes.   Yes we would.   :'}



_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg