IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] [homenet] PPP, DHCPv6 and Prefix Delegation

Athanasios Douitsis <aduitsis@gmail.com> Fri, 15 November 2013 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <aduitsis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEC611E8128; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MrGa3BdxW3kW; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D703311E80E0; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id to1so5523409ieb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=X0vyp2gv5+/JZO9r+oesbEI4+JWfDs6JyIy7OT46spI=; b=oRB/SukqdLtY8aukdDeHQq7UKPXPESlc6uP16Sqt2nf7j/p5amwtmqsiyozFNIfYQc Gi4vWv2Z1B2nw8mtjZY19x/TQMlz/dQ3ZNADQeOiZtQXbHc8VRbwcfU8vIiucT+FaH/X DrcE2msNpeEpTXCBsxYEoyC65SpvvocgavbHdWtVwSRVlj4bDq6RUXGy4SiUYEtiyNsJ +9RHESVDm5J4DmOH7EBz/MhpwDuHo8IBQDkRButmEPeRj5cYYDWHRIGYTUjl40lT9dfo ebfoG2PPbffswPX2CMRRGT5XySoHgzGgbz3Y2gVwdRoO9z5YUk0MsNokFj6cD0EpkY0O J2gg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.30.229 with SMTP id v5mr5822474igh.27.1384549146465; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.227.168 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:59:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOT5Kpp0dCqbZyFzwtjTh9UJ5hGHUMN0ZGQHUL35+mkO9VRrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <11836.1384276281@sandelman.ca> <CAKOT5Ko2OO=U_0jADb6R88JiFh59BLDSe4P0haqgaBr2M7HobA@mail.gmail.com> <3673.1384528283@sandelman.ca> <CAKOT5Kpp0dCqbZyFzwtjTh9UJ5hGHUMN0ZGQHUL35+mkO9VRrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 22:59:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CABT9mj-rw5bsVa7UAiraxu-U2t1QGqPronYj3Fx6ZxoPWo0Zow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Athanasios Douitsis <aduitsis@gmail.com>
To: Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bacc30c0c9f2404eb3d785b"
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, homenet@ietf.org, robmgl@cisco.com, radext@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [homenet] PPP, DHCPv6 and Prefix Delegation
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:59:16 -0000

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>wrote:

> More recently RFC 6603 about Prefix exclude was published so today you
> could theoretically do that if you use prefix exclude option, but I'm not
> sure how much this model has been adopted. It is referenced in
>  draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis WPD-8.


Hello,

Shouldn't there also be a Prefix Exclude Option RADIUS attribute? I can
imagine that the delegating router vendor could very well use the
Framed-IPv6-Prefix with a different set of semantics (i.e. have a
configuration option to use the Framed-IPv6-Prefix value in the prefix
exclude option instead of an RA), but a separate RADIUS attribute would be
more appropriate.

Kind regards,
-- 
Athanasios Douitsis

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email